PRINTABLE VERSION HERE 

Beauty is no longer simply a category. It has become a strategic cornerstone for department stores, as the category is booming but is also highly challenged. Department stores used to be the primary channel for beauty discovery, but e-commerce and social media have eroded their historical authority. As an example, only 24% of US shoppers now visit a department store to learn about new products. Instead, 71% turn to Sephora or Ulta Beauty, according to a PowerReviews survey. In parallel, department store revenues are declining across much of the sector, and apparel and luxury are facing structural headwinds. Under such circumstances, the relevance of the beauty offer across all its dimensions becomes critical. Galeries Lafayette Haussmann has recently unveiled its new beauty department, the perfect occasion to gain perspective on the current state of beauty in department stores and to address a pressing question: is it possible to evolve the category model?

Floors reborn: department stores bet big on beauty reinvention

Nordstrom: beauty takes centre stage in NYC

The picture is not completely bleak for department stores. As a replenishable category, beauty is structurally resilient. From that perspective, many department stores accelerated their in-store investments to create beauty destinations in an attempt to counter competition from speciality retailers. In August 2025, Nordstrom unveiled its new beauty floor at its NYC flagship store, turning what had been a fragmented experience into a unified beauty destination. Positioned at the main entrance, the rationale is simple: beauty should be the first thing customers see when they walk in.

The new space is organised into distinct but connected zones.

• A large make-up zone at the store entrance with brands like Charlotte Tilbury, MAC and Westman Atelier. The Beauty Bar, a communal space where customers can test products from different brands, attend makeup classes or experiment on their own terms, is a new feature. A dedicated area for emerging brands completes the section.
• Then, the space flows into a luxury and designer zone housing names like La Mer, La Prairie and Dior, each with their full store concept.
• The fragrance area has been doubled in size, featuring a floor-to-ceiling floral installation and an exclusive new technology called “AirParfum,” developed with Puig, which allows customers to discover up to 60 scents without overwhelming the senses.
• Finally, a section oriented towards beauty rituals offers a more open, self-discovery format covering skincare, haircare, body and wellness, with heritage brands like Estée Lauder and newer labels like Tata Harper and 111Skin.

Beyond the products, Nordstrom is investing heavily in service and community with a team of around 100 sales associates, a full-time beauty concierge team for agnostic advisory and a packed event calendar. There is also a medi-spa in addition to 250 free or paid services, ranging from nail and brow services to blowouts. The beauty department now spans 1,670 sqm, more than doubling the previous layout, signalling that the retailer is not just selling beauty products but building a destination.

Macy’s Herald Square classic beauty overhaul

In November 2025, Macy's completed the first phase of a major renovation of its beauty floor at the NYC Herald Square flagship store, the first significant update in over a decade. Interestingly, around 70-75% of the store's beauty customers are locals rather than tourists, making the investment relevant far beyond passing visitors. Once fully finished, the space will span 5,000 sqm and have more than 20 new brand shops.

Right from the entrance, customers are welcomed by big names like Chanel and Dior, as is often the case on beauty floors. The customer journey moves from fashion-house shop-in-shops at the front, through niche brands and luxury skincare, to a trendier multi-brand discovery space at the back. With the current category boom, fragrance remains a key driver, with over 200 references across 65 brands, and Macy's continues to hold the largest share of fragrance sales in the country.

Also, following the beauty trend book, Macy’s adds technology and services to the experience, with AI-powered skin diagnostic tools from Shiseido, an augmented reality headset from Parfums de Marly, and five relaxation rooms. A new space is planned for events such as brand masterclasses and pop-up stores.

Selfridges goes niche: the fragrance hall reimagined

Selfridges has completed a major refresh of its fragrance hall at its London store in February 2026, marking the final phase of a two-year renovation of the entire beauty floor. Fragrance has become Selfridges' fastest-growing category, and the store has decided to lean into that momentum. Placed right at the main entrance, the hall aims to become a world-leading fragrance destination. The selection spans nearly 50 brands, with 75% of the offering dedicated to niche or limited-distribution brands, grouped into three distinct themes: established, contemporary and emerging. More than 30 exclusives are on offer, including names like Discothèque.

Niche houses such as Maison Crivelli, Marc-Antoine Barrois, Initio and Matière Première sit alongside heritage names, giving the space a sense of discovery. Rather than leaving customers to navigate scents on their own, Selfridges has placed knowledgeable sales associates throughout the hall to guide and advise.

Beyond capitals: John Lewis sets a blueprint for beauty in the regions

In August 2025, John Lewis unveiled a major transformation of its Liverpool beauty hall, showing beauty is also a priority in secondary city stores. The department has been expanded by almost 40% to 1,500 sqm. Interactive zones replace some of the traditional counters. The hall now houses 132 premium brands, including 23 new or expanded counters, and introduces exclusive brands such as Fenty Beauty, Trinny London, Byredo and Maison Francis Kurkdjian to Liverpool for the first time. This renovation emphasises service and social shopping to create a seamless integration between in-store atmosphere and online convenience. The transformation is a part of John Lewis's £800 million brand investment and reflects the retailer's success in the beauty category, where sales have grown by more than 40% over the past five years. The Liverpool concept will serve as a blueprint for five additional beauty hall transformations planned in the coming months.

The renovations undertaken by these department stores show that scale matters. Whether it is Nordstrom doubling its beauty footprint, Macy's committing to 5,000 sqm, or Selfridges offering 50 perfume brands, the strategy is clearly to compete with Sephora's depth and curation and the endless discovery possibilities offered by social media. Also, with Nordstrom's concierge team and Selfridges’ fragrance experts, it seems retailers are betting on people to deliver a differentiating, more agnostic beauty experience. In a world where any product can be purchased with a click, expertise and experience are the true differentiators.

Beyond the brand counter: the beauty business model at a crossroads

The Sephora effect: the rise of brand-agnostic beauty spaces

Transforming the traditional brand counters beauty model into more open, experiential spaces is a growing concern on the department store beauty floors. Customers are now accustomed to browsing at Sephora or Space NK and tend to reject the conventional model with brand counters and their staff attached. Instead, they are increasingly expecting retailers to offer them the possibility to explore a range of brands and products with agnostic sales advisors who can guide them across all options. For department stores so far, the question has been more about how to best adapt to this trend than about transforming the brand counter business model. Complementing rather than replacing brand counters, many department stores are developing multi-brand areas. These spaces allow customers to browse freely and touch products. However, they usually offer a limited number of brands, as is the case at the Galeries Lafayette Haussmann store’s space dedicated to emerging and niche brands positioned at the centre of the Wellness Galerie. Dedicated Galeries Lafayette staff help shoppers in their decision. Display tables serve as small pop-up spaces, allowing for brand rotation and product novelty. The space is not big, though it gives a true sense of choice and is successful. Galeries Lafayette recently took a further step toward agnostic shopping by opening a second multi-brand area. In March 2026, they unveiled a 250 sqm “French pharmacy” space (also known as dermo-cosmetics). This time, using a different business model, it is operated by an external partner (Carré Opéra Pharmabest) on a concession basis with staff attached to the partner. Answering locals and tourists’ appetite for French pharmacy with 200 brands (such as La Roche-Posay, Bioderma, SVR, Caudalie, Nuxe, Melvita, Vichy, etc.) and 6,000 references, the launch has been successful with customers filling their baskets with several products at the same time.

A few years ago, Manor also onboarded external partners: L’Oréal for dermo-cosmetics spaces (including brands like La Roche Posay or CeraVe) and Sephora to offer Gen Z customers trendy colour cosmetics brands as well as the Sephora Collection private label. More recently, Manor has moved forward in developing multi-brand areas, with the Green Beauty Lab. The space includes brands such as Glowery, Melvita, Erborian, Weleda and Avril in addition to the dermo-cosmetics brands, organised under four distinct areas: clean, botanical, wellness and sustainable. This concept will be rolled out in ten stores with local adaptations. These examples show attempts to step back, at least in part, from the brand-counter-only model. It offers customers a more agnostic shopping experience and, in the case of Sephora, allows Manor to also carry additional brands which may have been difficult to attract otherwise.

Falabella’s Glow Bar is also a recent example of a multi-brand space. The first 80 sqm pink space gathers 55 brands in skincare, makeup, fragrances, hair care, accessories, dermo-cosmetics and a prominent K-beauty section. Inspired by international benchmarks in beauty speciality retail, the company aims to offer a curated, experiential format focused on trend discovery, including Fenty Beauty arriving in the country for the first time. This launch clearly caters to consumers seeking experience, novelty, expert advice and, most important of all, the freedom to browse and try before you buy.

Galeries Lafayette's three-floor beauty vision

The recent beauty rehaul at the Galeries Lafayette Haussmann store offers more than a French pharmacy space. In fact, the beauty department now spans three floors, a deliberate vertical journey as stated by CEO Arthur Lemoine:

• The -1 floor offers a renewed version of the Wellness Galerie opened in 2022, oriented towards care brands (see more below).
• The ground floor centres on fragrance and makeup. The integration of new hot brands such as Victoria Beckham and Louis Vuitton makeup offerings increased the ground floor appeal. In parallel, they introduced a section of 13 niche fragrance brands, including Bottega Veneta and Creed.
• Creating a destination within the luxury RTW floor, the +1 floor proposes a convergence between luxury fashion, jewellery and beauty with high perfumery spaces for Loewe, Guerlain, Dior, Chanel, Maison Francis Kurkdjian, Officine Universelle Buly 1803 and, from June, Saint Laurent's first-ever beauty-accessories fusion concept.

This overhaul aims to differentiate Galeries Lafayette from competitors by providing an experience that blends luxury and beauty, for a lifestyle feeling and a customer journey that encourages cross-category discovery and higher conversion rates. Now accounting for about 10% of the store’s annual volume, beauty has posted double-digit growth, continuing into 2026. The refurbishment has expanded the beauty selling space to 3,700 sqm, an increase of 500 sqm and brought the total brand count to 440.

The normalisation of wellness

Harrods' closed-door wellness: when retail meets the clinic

Shifts in customer behaviour towards self-care, the relentless need for retailers to diversify into new categories and to add a revenue stream by taking a share of a business McKinsey estimated at around $1.5 trillion in 2020… these are all reasons why retailers have explored wellness. What was initially a blurry category encompassing fitness, nutrition, overall physical and mental health and appearance, is now normalised, with a key question at its core: services as a way to evolve the business model.

First on the trend, Harrods made a bold move in 2017 by opening a closed-door, appointment-only Wellness Clinic on the fourth floor in Knightsbridge, a significant shift in how luxury department stores were beginning to think about beauty and wellbeing. Spanning almost 1,000 sqm, the space was never intended to be a traditional spa or beauty salon. Instead, Harrods’ very own take on wellness was conceived as a high-end, results-driven clinic offering a curated selection of treatments.

The space was designed to feel clinical without being cold, and luxurious without being indulgent. The goal was not pampering but rather treatments with measurable results. The range was unusually wide for a department store. Harrods assembled a multidisciplinary team covering everything from injectables and body contouring to cryotherapy, DNA-based personalised skincare, IV vitamin infusions, and more. A dedicated partnership with a wellness expert brought daily personal training and nutritional coaching on site, with a bespoke programme created exclusively for Harrods clients. The Wellness Clinic also offers dental services, osteopathy, podiatry and physiotherapy. More than simply a new service, the Wellness Clinic, which is still running to this day, was an early and clear signal that brick-and-mortar retail needed to reinvent its purpose, and that experience, expertise and personalisation were the most important reasons to visit a department store. However, it didn’t reinvent beauty in department stores, just evolving and developing beauty services to a scale never seen before

From ambition to pragmatism: Galeries Lafayette’s reality check

Galeries Lafayette also made headlines in 2022 when the Wellness Galerie opened on a whopping 3,000 sqm surface spanning the whole -1 floor of the Haussmann flagship store. It was a step forward in terms of space and share allocated to services compared to products, with an impressive 60%-40% ratio. Galeries Lafayette had an ambitious goal: becoming the destination for well-being in Paris, with a gym studio, a healthy restaurant, a full catalogue of services such as osteopathy, cryotherapy, hyperbaric chamber, meditation, muscle strengthening, yoga and Pilates, infrared saunas, anti-ageing and silhouette-enhancing treatments, nutritional coaching, physiotherapist, nails and brow services and more. The brands embedded in the space were oriented towards care, as exemplified by the multi-brand area (see above) and traditional brand counters such as Barbara Stürm, Augustinus Bader, Clinique and The Ordinary, to name a few.

In March 2026, they unveiled an updated version of the Wellness Galerie. Department store floors are obviously in constant evolution, but this rehaul probably demonstrates how challenging it is to convey the wellness message to customers to maximise service profitability. Maintaining some of the previous services such as massages, anti-ageing treatments, brow and nail salons and the gym, the revamp emphasises a “care” message over the wellness word and adopts a more classic approach to services. Their overall number has decreased, but the most important difference lies in the addition of brands’ three-walls shop-in-shops, large enough to accommodate beauty cabins, doubling the number of treatment rooms to 20 (with Clarins, La Mer, Estée Lauder, Helena Rubinstein, EviDenS, for example).

The contrasting trajectories of Harrods and Galeries Lafayette offer a picture of where wellness stands in department stores, showing the commercial tension at the heart of the “category”: services are expensive to operate, difficult to scale, and require more customer education than products. Harrods' model endures because it never tried to democratise wellness. By keeping its clinic expensive and appointment-only, it defined a niche that aligned with its affluent clientele and price positioning. It did not attempt to reinvent the beauty floor. Galeries Lafayette's original Wellness Galerie was a genuine experiment in rethinking what a beauty floor could be: a rethink of the business model through an extensive catalogue of services. Both a sign of maturity and normalisation of wellness, the 2026 revision also shows how difficult it is to change the business model. As Lemoine describes it, the floor is now capitalising on the right balance between services and products.

The satellite bet: additional commercial models against competition

From anchor to standalone: how Harrods built a scalable off-flagship business

Despite competition from local retailers such as Space NK, The Fragrance Shop and Superdrug, Harrods has long held its position as the UK’s biggest beauty retailer, with a 9.3% share of the national market from a single 8,300 sqm location. In 2019, they announced an ambitious expansion plan with the launch of H Beauty, a new concept of standalone beauty boutiques set to open across the UK. The first store opened in late 2020, swapping Harrods' green signature for a pink aesthetic, deliberately targeting a younger, digitally savvy generation.

The first stores didn’t open in a prestigious city-centre location, but in the suburban shopping centres Intu Lakeside in Essex and Intu in Milton Keynes. The rationale was clear: the flagship in Knightsbridge caters primarily to tourists and an older, wealthier demographic, while H Beauty would be explicitly designed to reach a younger, local consumer base that had shopped previously at competitors. Stores are built around experience and exclusivity, with makeup stations, virtual try-on mirrors and masterclasses, all part of a broader omnichannel vision.

Industry reactions were mixed in 2019: some questioned why Harrods had not chosen a more premium location, while others saw it as a smart and timely move to claim territory before competitors did, aka Sephora (which would enter the market in 2023). What most agreed on was that the success of H Beauty would ultimately depend on the quality of the in-store experience and Harrods' ability to translate its luxury credentials into a format that is accessible to younger customers. In 2026, Harrods operates seven H Beauty stores, demonstrating a successful model that is giving the department store greater control and access over brands.

The limits of the concept: Harvey Nichols' standalone bet failed

Not all department stores were as successful as Harrods. In March 2025, Harvey Nichols announced they would close their only standalone beauty shop, Beauty Bazaar, in Liverpool’s ONE shopping centre. Opened in 2012, the store was originally considered a pioneering concept, as it was the first time a major luxury retailer had created an entirely dedicated beauty and wellbeing space of this kind outside of London. It was supposed to set a new benchmark for what a beauty destination could look like: a single space where luxury retail, social experience and professional treatments could coexist under one roof.

The ground floor brought together established international names and niche and contemporary brands, for depth and discovery. A standout feature was a perfume library designed to let customers explore fragrances freely, with no counter or sales assistant standing between them and the bottles. The +1 floor was more social. A champagne and cocktail bar was surrounded by open treatment areas for pedicures, a hair salon, brow, lashes and nail services. Customers could browse, book treatments, or shop online via iPads, making the floor feel as much like a social venue as a beauty destination. The +2 floor completed the journey with a private spa reminiscent of a five-star hotel.

The department stores’ investments in beauty are striking in their scale and their ambition. The message is consistent: beauty is no longer just a floor, but rather a strategy. Department stores are not simply upgrading a category: with its repeatability and experiential potential, beauty has to stay on-trend, but also becomes an answer when apparel stumbles and luxury fragments and grows increasingly direct-to-consumer.

Away from the brand counter and towards spaces that prioritise the customer's journey, the rise of multi-brand zones points to an industry that has absorbed Sephora's lessons and is acting on them. Partnering with external specialists represents a pragmatic willingness to give away control in exchange for relevance. The wellness chapter offers a more sobering lesson. Galeries Lafayette's Wellness Galerie was visionary. Its recalibration is grounded. Harrods' Wellness Clinic endures, but it is the exception rather than the rule. For most department stores, wellness will remain a layer rather than a foundation. The H Beauty satellite experiments add a final dimension and a possible, yet not universal, growth vehicle to reach demographics that a single store cannot do.

Credits: IADS (Christine Montard)

What: AI chatbots’ tendency to affirm users’ beliefs can lead to harmful “delusional spirals,” raising urgent concerns for user safety and trust.

Why it is important: Addressing these risks is critical to maintaining user trust and preventing real-world harm, as demonstrated by recent regulatory and reputational challenges.

The article explores the escalating risk of “delusional spirals” in interactions between humans and AI chatbots, where the technology’s design to validate and empathise can inadvertently reinforce users’ distorted beliefs and emotional vulnerabilities. Stanford researchers, analysing real conversation transcripts, found that chatbots’ sycophantic responses can escalate grandiose or paranoid ideas, sometimes resulting in severe real-world consequences, including damaged relationships and suicide. The absence of critical feedback from AI, coupled with its capacity for endless affirmation, creates a destabilising environment for users susceptible to delusion. The researchers emphasise that these outcomes stem from a misalignment between AI’s programming and the unpredictable ways people engage with these systems. They advocate for developers to integrate detection filters and crisis escalation protocols, and urge policymakers to treat AI alignment as a public health concern, requiring new standards for transparency and intervention. The article highlights the pressing need for safeguards to prevent AI from exacerbating vulnerabilities in at-risk individuals.

IADS Notes: The Stanford study’s warning about AI-driven “delusional spirals” in chatbot interactions is echoed by recent media coverage. The Woolworths chatbot incident reported by The Robin Report in April 2026 exposed significant vulnerabilities and trust issues in AI deployments. Harvard Business Review in April 2026 emphasised the need for adaptive governance and robust cybersecurity as AI innovation accelerates. Tech Policy’s January 2026 analysis confirmed that anthropomorphising AI distorts customer expectations, reinforcing the importance of transparency and oversight. Forbes’ December 2025 report on regulatory backlash against covert AI-driven pricing illustrated how unchecked algorithmic practices can prompt public health concerns and legislative action. Inside Retail’s September 2025 discussion of “AI psychosis” further underscored the necessity for ethical guidelines and crisis management protocols to protect both users and brands.

AI’s ‘delusional spirals’ (and what to do about them)

What: BCG's four 2050 scenarios diverge on almost every measure. On one point they converge: retailers built around today's business models face structural exposure in three of the four futures.

Why it is important: Department stores are disproportionately exposed to the two most disruptive scenarios — AI Abundance and Digital Darwinism — where AI-native competitors and accelerating wealth concentration alter the competitive set. Scenario-based planning is not an abstract exercise; it determines where to invest, what to exit, and when.

The BCG Henderson Institute's Scenarios 2050 maps four distinct futures for the global economy — AI Abundance, Battling Blocs, Climate Coalition, and Digital Darwinism — each with direct implications for retail. Built from quantitative analysis of 100 megatrends and a century of historical data, the scenarios are not forecasts. They are structured tools for stress-testing strategy against a range of plausible outcomes.AI and automation run through all four futures, but their consequences diverge sharply. In AI Abundance, they drive a near-tripling of global GDP and a four-day working week. In Digital Darwinism, they accelerate wealth concentration and erode the middle class. Retailers cannot plan for a single version of this disruption — the strategic responses to each scenario are too different.Demographic pressure compounds the challenge. The collapse of age-based segmentation is already underway, with Gen Alpha and ageing populations creating consumer profiles that traditional retail structures were not built to serve. Product development, store experience, and engagement strategies will all need to account for several consumer cohorts simultaneously.The BCG report identifies five low-regret moves valid across all four scenarios. For retailers, the most immediately pressing are structural resilience, workforce adaptability, and digital flexibility — none of which require waiting to see which future arrives.

IADS Notes: Recent industry coverage reinforces the BCG analysis. BCG (February 2026) detailed how AI is altering retail cost structures and workforce composition at a pace that outstrips most retailers' current planning cycles. Forbes and Inside Retail (January and April 2026) document the decline of age-based segmentation and the rise of Gen Alpha as a digitally fluent, value-conscious consumer cohort demanding authenticity over inherited brand equity. Harvard Business Review and BCG (March and February 2026) point to operational innovation, agile leadership, and structured scenario planning as the distinguishing capabilities of retailers performing well under sustained pressure.

Beyond Tomorrow: Four scenarios for the world of 2050

The global economy could split in very different directions by 2050 - press release

What: Omnichannel customer service fails when AI is layered onto fragmented systems, leading to poor experiences and customer churn.

Why it is important: Fragmented systems undermine AI’s potential, as recent reports show only unified data and workflows drive real improvements in customer experience.

Layering AI onto fragmented CRM systems worsens customer service, causing frustration and prompting nearly half of French consumers to consider switching brands after a negative experience. Customers spend significant time—8.4 hours annually—trying to resolve issues, revealing the inefficiency of disconnected workflows and siloed data. Traditional CRM setups often lack a complete customer view, forcing both customers and agents to repeat information and use multiple platforms. The article emphasises that only a unified CRM and integrated workflows can support the seamless omnichannel service modern consumers expect. Without this foundation, AI cannot improve outcomes, and companies risk losing both loyalty and operational efficiency.

IADS Notes: Recent analyses confirm that fragmented CRM and AI systems continue to undermine customer experience in retail, as highlighted in April 2026 by Journal du Net, where disconnected workflows and siloed data were shown to increase customer frustration and churn. The measurable cost of poor service is significant, with nearly half of French consumers willing to switch brands after a negative experience, reinforcing the urgency for unified, omnichannel strategies. November 2025 reporting underscores that operational excellence and unified data are now essential for regaining consumer loyalty, while January 2026 findings demonstrate that unified POS systems and real-time data are central to delivering seamless, personalised experiences across all channels. The operational burden on customer service agents, who often juggle multiple systems, further diminishes efficiency and satisfaction, a challenge echoed in both April 2026 and July 2025 research, which stress the need for integrated tools and comprehensive training. Despite substantial AI investments, February 2026 and July 2025 sources reveal that only a minority of retailers achieve meaningful improvements, with most failing to scale initiatives due to persistent silos and lack of transformative leadership. (April 2026, November 2025, January 2026, July 2025, February 2026)

Is omnichannel causing customer service to become… amnesiac?

What: The adoption of agentic AI is shifting retail merchandising toward continuous, data-driven orchestration, requiring new operating models and strategic focus.

Why it is important: The rise of agentic commerce highlights that visibility in AI systems is now directly tied to revenue, requiring retailers to rethink discoverability, engagement, and operational agility.

Retail merchandising is being redesigned around AI agents. Decisions that once required human orchestration across pricing, promotion, assortment, and inventory are shifting to specialised systems that monitor conditions continuously and coordinate through a central orchestration agent that keeps each lever aligned with overall strategy. Decisions that once took weeks can happen in hours; annual category reviews that consumed half a year may disappear entirely as merchandising becomes an always-on process. The economic case rests not on a single breakthrough but on the steady elimination of value leakage across thousands of daily choices. As agents absorb operational tasks, the merchant's role narrows toward work AI cannot yet replicate: vendor relationships, brand development, and portfolio decisions that require contextual judgement. Realising these benefits demands more than deploying new tools. Retailers need standardised data and definitions, quantitative engines reliable enough to act as decision foundations, and an operating model rebuilt around end-to-end ownership rather than functional silos. Those who move first will gain on margin, inventory turn, and response speed. Those who delay cede ground to agents they do not control.

IADS Notes: Several converging analyses confirm that AI agents are entering the operational core of retail merchandising — and that the window for unhurried preparation is closing. April 2026 reporting shows that AI-driven agents are already shifting product discoverability from consumer choice to autonomous recommendation, forcing retailers to rethink how they are found and ranked within AI systems. BCG's April 2026 research is direct: absence from those systems is no longer a visibility problem — it is a revenue problem, making data governance and agent-ready APIs commercial priorities, not infrastructure afterthoughts. The May 2025 BCG survey of 350 retailers finds the capability gap widest not in technology but in operating model design — most retailers have adopted AI tools without restructuring the teams expected to work alongside them. McKinsey's November 2025 analysis shows agentic commerce automating and personalising each stage of the shopping journey in ways that render current engagement models obsolete. Forbes in August 2025 documents the organisational consequence: as AI absorbs operational decision-making, merchants are shifting from process managers to strategic owners of vendor relationships, creative direction, and category vision.

Always-On Merchandising: How AI agents are transforming retail

What: AI-driven transformation is reshaping Southeast Asian retail, delivering operational gains for early adopters while exposing gaps in governance and employee preparedness.

Why it is important: Persistent barriers to scaling AI in Southeast Asian retail reveal that success depends on balancing innovation with compliance and human expertise.

Southeast Asian retail is undergoing a significant transformation as AI adoption accelerates, with early adopters achieving measurable improvements in operational efficiency and customer engagement. Retailers are moving beyond generic AI tools to implement domain-specific models tailored to their unique business needs, resulting in notable gains in service quality and productivity. However, the sector faces persistent challenges in scaling these solutions, with only a minority of companies able to fully integrate AI across their operations. Key obstacles include regulatory complexity, fragmented compliance frameworks, and a workforce that often lacks the necessary skills and training to adapt to AI-driven change. Despite high usage rates and reported revenue growth, the gap between technological innovation and organisational readiness remains a critical barrier. The future success of Southeast Asian retail will depend on the ability to invest in robust governance, systematic upskilling, and a balanced approach that leverages both automation and human expertise to sustain competitive advantage in an increasingly digital marketplace.

IADS Notes: In January 2026, Retail Touchpoints reported that domain-specific AI models are driving efficiency gains, but only 10% of retailers have scaled these solutions due to integration and workforce challenges. BCG in November 2025 emphasised that early adopters benefit from productivity gains, while Deloitte in September 2025 and BCG in October 2025 highlighted persistent barriers in regulatory compliance and employee preparedness. By February 2026, BCG confirmed that future competitiveness will rely on proactive investment in AI, agile leadership, and a focus on customer experience, even as integration and workforce gaps persist.

Southeast Asia’s AI dilemma

PRINTABLE VERSION HERE 

Abercrombie & Fitch (A&F) was once the epitome of “cool” for American teens in the late 1990s and early 2000s – a brand built on exclusivity, aspirational imagery, and a very narrow definition of who fits in. Its stores, with thumping music and overpowering cologne, became social hubs for youth and symbolised status for those deemed attractive enough to “wear the moose”. Yet the same exclusivity that fuelled Abercrombie’s rise eventually led to its fall. Controversies over discrimination and a lack of diversity tarnished the brand’s image, leading to lawsuits, public backlash, and a significant loss of relevance.

This is why, in the 2025 IADS White Paper, DEI at a crossroads in retail, Abercrombie & Fitch is cited as a case where DEI was neglected, inconsistently sustained, and ultimately mishandled—resulting in significant reputational, cultural, and operational consequences. Positioned as a lesson from the field rather than an isolated failure, the brand’s trajectory illustrates how progress on inclusion is neither linear nor guaranteed.

This Exclusive examines Abercrombie & Fitch’s history through a DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) lens – how an exclusionary culture caused harm, who was most impacted, and what lessons retail and department store leaders can draw from A&F’s reckoning and ongoing turnaround.

The rise of an exclusive brand

A&F’s modern incarnation was crafted in the 1990s under CEO Mike Jeffries, who transformed the 100-year-old sporting goods outfitter into a preppy, sexy, youth-oriented apparel empire. Jeffres’ vision fused Calvin Klein-style provocative marketing with Ralph Lauren’s all-American prep, sold at prices teens could aspire to. The brand cultivated a “cool kids” image at every turn. Stores were designed like nightclubs, with thumping music, dim lighting, and a signature musk (Fierce) sprayed into the air to create an exclusive atmosphere that drew young shoppers. Staff were hired for looks and instructed to appear nonchalant (even borderline snobbish) toward customers, reinforcing the sense that shopping at A&F was a privilege. Teens of the era, lacking today’s social media, took cues from mall culture and A&F’s giant glossy ads to learn what was “in”. In the late ‘90s and early ‘00s, Abercrombie & Fitch became a pop culture phenomenon, defining teen fashion and beauty standards. However, those standards were largely “thin, white, and young”, as described in the Netflix documentary White Hot: The Rise & Fall of Abercrombie & Fitch (2022).

Abercrombie & Fitch’s marketing in the 1990s-2000S glorified and idealised an exclusive image. Stores prominently displayed huge posters of scantily clad, athletic young models (usually white), reflecting CEO Mike Jeefries’ vision of “attractive, all-American” youth. This aspirational branding, combined with dimly lit, music-filled stores and “cool” aloo staff, made A&F a status symbol for some shoppers while implicitly alienating those who didn’t fit the mould.

From advertising to store associates, Abercrombie’s concept of “All-American” was extremely narrow. Former CEO Mike Jeffries infamously admitted that the brand was built on exclusion: “We go after the cool kids… A lot of people don’t belong [in our clothes], and they can’t belong. Are we exclusionary? Absolutely.” In practice, this meant A&F’s public image featured almost exclusively white, fit, conventionally attractive models and actors. The company deliberately did not offer plus sizes for women for many years (women above size 101 or so simply weren’t apart of the target look). In the store environment, “all-American” often functioned as code for white, a reality that would soon lead to serious trouble.

Exclusion by design

Abercrombie’s exclusionary ethos extended beyond marketing; it permeated hiring and operations. By the early 2000s, reports and complaints surfaced that A&F was systematically hiring and promoting based on looks and race. Store managers were under pressure to staff sales floors with what the company deemed “on-brand” people – overwhelmingly white, clean-cut, and slim. Minorities who were hired were often assigned to back-of-store stockroom positions or had their hours cut if they didn’t fit the desired image. In one noted case, a Latino applicant was told he could work in the stock room but not out front with customers, a humiliation he later described in court. The company even had “Look Policy” guidelines forbidding certain personal styles disproportionately associated with nonwhite individuals (for example, banning dreadlocks for employees).

These practices led to a landmark class action lawsuit in 2003 (Gonzalez v. Abercrombie & Fitch), filed by Asian American, Black, Latino, and female plaintiffs. They charged that Abercrombie refused to hire qualified minority candidates for sales jobs, or hid them in the back, solely because they didn’t match the “A&F look.” The case uncovered that recruiting often targeted white fraternities and sororities to pipeline “attractive” (and mostly white) staff, and managers were instructed to maintain the look, even if it meant overt discrimination. In late 2004, A&F settled the lawsuit for about $40 million without admitting wrongdoing. The settlement’s consent decree required Abercrombie to address its biased practices: the company had to implement diversity programs, hire a Vice President of Diversity & Inclusion, bring in 25 recruiters to recruit minority employees, and ensure that marketing materials included models of colour. Essentially, Abercrombie was forced to implement basic DEI measures that, in hindsight, could have prevented the debacle in the first place.

Around the same time, A&F’s marketing provoked public outrage for racism and insensitivity. The brand produced graphic T-shirts with caricatures and slogans that offended Asian Americans – most notoriously a shirt featuring two smiling Asian figures and the words “Two Wongs Can Make It White,” which played on a racist trope. After Asian American student groups organised protests and boycotts, the company pulled the shirts and issued a sheepish apology. But the pattern of operating “in a bubble” with tone-deaf ideas was clear. Abercrombie’s exclusion was so entrenched that even satirists took notice – comedy sketches lampooned the brand’s elite, white image and the unfriendly attitude of its store staff. By the early 2010s, Abercrombie was increasingly seen as out of touch and out of step with evolving social values.

One flashpoint came in 2013, when comments Mike Jeffries had made years earlier resurfaced and went viral. In a 2006 interview, Jeffries proudly embraced “exclusionary” marketing and suggested that A&F wanted only “thin and beautiful” people wearing their clothes. The public reaction in 2013 was swift and negative – petitions garnered thousands of signatures urging Abercrombie to offer larger sizes and to stop “fat shaming” would-be customers. That year, a young activist named Benjamin O’Keefe started a viral petition calling out Abercrombie’s discriminatory sizing and marketing; he urged a boycott until the brand catered to “people of all sizes.” Looking back, O’Keefe said, “They [A&F] rooted themselves in discrimination at every single level.” His campaign captured a growing sentiment that Abercrombie’s once “cool” exclusivity had become ugly and unacceptable.

Impact on people and culture

For those who didn’t fit Abercrombie’s narrow ideal, the brand’s practices were more than just offensive – they were personally damaging. Employees and job applicants from minority backgrounds were perhaps the most directly harmed. Numerous young people had the experience of being implicitly told “you’re not what we’re looking for” because of their skin colour, ethnicity, or features. The 2003 lawsuit included students from Stanford and other colleges who were deeply discouraged after being steered away from customer-facing roles for being Latino, Black, or Asian. This kind of bias not only denied equal opportunity but also inflicted lasting psychological harm on those rejected for who they were. As one plaintiff recalled, “I felt it was because I was a Latino – but there was no one I could report this to at the time.” The legal case finally gave these youths a voice and a measure of justice through compensation and mandated reforms.

Customers were also affected in less quantifiable but real ways. Throughout the 2000s, A&F’s advertising sent a message that only certain people were “cool enough” for the brand – namely, white, athletic, attractive teens. This contributed to a toxic beauty standard that left many young people feeling inferior. Teenagers who were heavier, or of a different race, or couldn’t afford the clothes, often internalised that they “didn’t belong” in Abercrombie’s world. The documentary White Hot: The Rise & Fall of Abercrombie & Fitch notes that the brand “kept those messages pretty overt” about whose bodies and looks were considered right. In an era before body positivity and diversity were mainstream, A&F’s popularity actually amplified insecurities among those on the outside. As director Alison Klayman observed, talking about Abercrombie inevitably brings up personal stories about “body insecurities” and “what it meant to be a young person” bombarded with these images.

Additionally, certain religious and cultural groups clashed with Abercrombie’s policies. A notable example is the case of a Muslim teenager who in 2008 was denied a sales job because she wore a hijab, which violated Abercrombie’s strict “Look Policy” prohibiting head coverings. This led to a lawsuit that went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. In 2015, the Court ruled 8–1 against Abercrombie, declaring that refusing to hire someone in order to avoid accommodating a religious practice (like wearing a hijab) was a violation of civil rights law. The Supreme Court decision underscored how discriminatory policies had been literally built into Abercrombie’s dress code, and it further damaged the company’s reputation. By then, what once was sold as the “perfect All-American look” had been widely exposed as a euphemism for prejudice, alienating not only people of color but anyone who didn’t mirror the company’s very limited image of American youth.

The fall : business consequences of a toxic culture

The social and legal backlash against Abercrombie & Fitch ultimately led to significant business problems. In the late 1990s, exclusivity might have helped A&F stand out, but by the 2010s, consumer values had shifted dramatically. A new generation prioritised inclusion and social justice, and they had many more clothing options. A&F’s sales plunged as teens and young adults flocked to competitors that seemed more inclusive or authentic. By the mid-2010s, the once “white hot” brand was losing money and closing stores. Its image was stale – even to its core audience. As one commentator put it, exclusion stopped being cool. Many shoppers simply “don’t spend money where you feel bad about yourself”, and Abercrombie has made a lot of people feel bad

Internally, the company also struggled. After 2004, Abercrombie did make some superficial changes under the consent decree – hiring more people of colour, adding diversity training – but the toxic ethos persisted. Executives like Jeffries did not publicly acknowledge the cultural failings. Former diversity officer Todd Corley later noted that while he managed to increase the diversity of the workforce (A&F went from about 90% white employees to closer to 50% white in roughly eight years), he often lacked full support. Jeffries continued to make tone-deaf remarks or policies that “arguably worked against Corley’s progress”. Indeed, when the court-appointed monitoring ended in 2011, Abercrombie was quick to slip back into old habits in marketing, still featuring almost all-white models in giant store posters. The culture at the top had not fundamentally changed. This tension culminated in Mike Jeffries’ ouster in late 2014 amid slumping sales and mounting public criticism. By then, Abercrombie & Fitch had, in the words of one retail analyst, burned “white hot” and burned out– it had lost the cachet it once exploited, and was left with a battered reputation among both consumers and prospective employees.

Notably, revelations about the deeper dysfunction of Abercrombie’s leadership continued to emerge even after Jeffries’ departure. In 2023, news investigations alleged that Mike Jeffries had engaged in exploitative conduct with models during his tenure. Such headlines reinforce how a company culture that tolerated discrimination and objectification can breed other unethical behaviours. Abercrombie’s fall stands as a cautionary tale: a brand that glorified exclusivity to the point of discrimination sowed the seeds of its own decline.

Turning the ship: Abercrombie’s attempt at reinvention

With Jeffries gone and mounting pressure to improve, Abercrombie & Fitch began a slow turnaround, seeking to transform itself from an exclusionary brand to a far more inclusive one. New leadership took the helm – most notably Fran Horowitz, who became CEO in 2017. Horowitz publicly acknowledged that Abercrombie had to fundamentally change, saying “We are fundamentally a different company than we were back then” and “very focused on diversity and inclusion”. Under her direction, A&F finally abandoned the “cool kids only” playbook and made moves to invite a broader range of customers:

• Inclusive marketing: The company dropped its hyper-sexualised, whitewashed ads. Abercrombie’s campaigns now feature models of many different skin tones, body types, and sizes, emphasising real people and everyday stories instead of unattainable fantasies. This shift aligns the brand with modern expectations – as the director of White Hot noted, Abercrombie’s new imagery “puts them in line with what good business looks like today”.
• Product range and sizing: Abercrombie finally extended its sizing and styles to cater to more body types. It introduced “Curve Love” jeans and expanded women’s sizes beyond the previous limits. By embracing plus-size customers and offering more diverse fits (looser cuts, curvy fits, etc.), the brand signalled that everyone is welcome – a stark contrast to its old stance of refusing to carry larger sizes. These changes not only won back some customers but even created a “cult following” for certain inclusive products like the Curve Love line.
• Workforce & culture: Building on earlier efforts, A&F’s workforce today is much more diverse, and the overt “look” biases have been curtailed. Store associates are no longer hired (or fired) based on a single aesthetic mold. There’s also a greater emphasis on employee experience and openness – a far cry from the days when only one kind of person could thrive at the company. (It’s telling that Abercrombie won several Best Place to Work for LGBTQ Equality awards in the late 2000s under Corley’s guidance, reflecting some cultural growth.) Still, questions remain about how fully the internal culture has reckoned with the past; meaningful inclusion requires ongoing commitment beyond just marketing fixes.

These reforms have started to pay off. By 2021–2022, Abercrombie’s sales had stabilised and even grown, after years of decline. The company’s rebrand resonated with some young adults who rediscovered the label after it shed its old baggage. On TikTok, for instance, the hashtag #AbercrombieIsBack trended as new customers showed off the revamped styles and messaging. A&F’s share price rebounded as investors gained confidence in the turnaround. While Abercrombie will likely never dominate culture the way it did in 1999, it has at least moved from being a case study in exclusion to a case study in redemption through inclusion.

Horowitz’s strategy – focusing on knowing the customer and “meticulously building the product, voice and experience to match their needs” – is essentially a customer-centric approach that couldn’t be more different from the old Jeffries approach. Where Abercrombie once dictated a fantasy to consumers, it now listens and adapts to them. That includes the simple realisation: diversity is a business imperative. In fact, part of the 2004 consent decree was a line from civil rights attorneys noting “Abercrombie now realises diversity makes good business sense”– a lesson it took the company another decade to truly embrace.

Lessons for retail

Abercrombie & Fitch’s DEI journey – from exclusive to inclusive (and still in progress) – offers several powerful lessons for retailers and consumer brands in general:

• Exclusion is not a sustainable strategy: What might create short-term buzz, or a feeling of “elite” coolness, can backfire spectacularly. Catering to a narrow ideal of beauty or identity alienates large segments of potential customers and ultimately becomes a liability as societal values evolve. In retail, coolness is a moving target, but respect and inclusion have enduring value. Brands that hinge their appeal on putting others down are on borrowed time.
• Diversity and inclusion are smart business: Embracing DEI is not just a moral stance but a market opportunity. A&F learned the hard way that exclusion comes with real business consequences. By excluding large demographics (whether through limited sizing, racist imagery, or biased hiring), Abercrombie left money on the table for years. Retailers succeed when customers feel seen and welcome – which translates into broader market reach and loyalty. Companies, from department stores to startups, can take note: an inclusive brand can attract a wider customer base and avoid unnecessary reputational risks.
• Toxic culture starts at the top: Abercrombie’s downfall illustrates how leadership attitudes cascade into company culture. Jeffries’ openly exclusionary philosophy became “baked in” to every policy, from hiring to marketing. Leaders in any organisation must recognise their role in setting the tone. A culture that tolerates discrimination or objectification in any form will eventually face scandal or legal action, as seen with A&F’s lawsuits and even the personal misconduct allegations against its former CEO. Conversely, leadership commitment to inclusion can drive positive change – Horowitz’s approach has clearly helped rehabilitate Abercrombie’s culture and image.
• Accountability and continuous improvement: A&F’s initial responses (settlements, hiring a diversity officer, etc.) were not enough because they weren’t accompanied by genuine accountability or attitude shifts. The consent decree imposed changes, but once external monitoring ended, old habits crept back. True inclusion is an ongoing effort, not a one-off PR fix. Retailers must continuously engage with diverse voices (employees, customers, consultants) to identify blind spots and hold themselves accountable to progress even when public attention wanes.
• Representation matters: One of the simplest takeaways is the importance of representation in both branding and staffing. Abercrombie’s story shows that seeing only one type of person in ads or in sales roles sends a message – and people notice. Modern consumers expect brands, especially mainstream retailers and department stores, to reflect the real diversity of society. This means featuring different races, body types, ages, and abilities in advertising, and ensuring inclusive hiring from the sales floor to the boardroom. Representation isn’t about political correctness; it tangibly impacts how welcome customers and employees feel.

Conclusion: DEI as part of retail resilience

The saga of Abercrombie & Fitch serves as a lesson from the field in how a deliberately cultivated image of exclusivity became a company’s Achilles’ heel. What was once heralded as “aspirational” came to be seen as discriminatory and out of touch. The people most hurt along the way were those whom A&F’s leadership chose to exclude – racial minorities denied jobs, young women shamed for their bodies, individuals whose sense of self-worth took a hit from not “belonging” in the A&F world. In the end, Abercrombie paid the price in lawsuits, lost customers, and a near-collapse of the business.

Yet, Abercrombie & Fitch’s ongoing reinvention also demonstrates that change is possible, if not always easy. The company has begun rebuilding trust by doing what it should have done all along: embracing inclusion as part of its brand identity. As explored further in the IADS White Paper DEI at a crossroads in retail, Abercrombie & Fitch is not an isolated case; it sits alongside other global retail examples that show how progress on DEI can stall, reverse, or regain momentum depending on leadership focus and sustained commitment. Inclusion and diversity are not antithetical to a cool brand – they are the new currency of cool. A&F’s fall and rise underline a broader truth: in today’s world, the brands that thrive will be those that make everyone feel like they belong. Abercrombie & Fitch had to learn this through failure, but others can heed the lesson upfront – exclusivity might sell cologne and T-shirts for a season, but inclusion sells longevity.

Credits: IADS (Maya Sankoh)

What: Retailers are moving beyond traditional cost-cutting to rebuild their operating models, deploying AI across pricing, labour, and procurement to expand margins and fund future investment.

Why is it important: With operating margin correlating more strongly with long-term shareholder returns than revenue growth, retailers that expand it gain the financial room to sustain investment, absorb cost shocks, and compete on the AI capabilities that will define the next cycle.

Across 55 North American retailers, operating margin fell from 6.7% in 2021 to 5.9% over the last twelve months. The causes are structural, not cyclical: product, labour, and operational costs continue to climb while traditional levers, including supplier price pressure and headcount reduction, have largely been exhausted.The industry's response is to rebuild cost ownership at the operating model level: renegotiating supplier relationships across assortment and pricing simultaneously, redesigning workflows around AI-enabled processes, and distributing margin accountability beyond the finance department. BCG's analysis found that three- and four-year total shareholder returns correlate twice as strongly with operating margin expansion as with revenue growth, placing cost discipline at the centre of investor value creation.Retailers are also deploying AI across pricing, labour scheduling, and demand forecasting to generate efficiency gains that manual processes cannot replicate at pace. These investments require near-term capital at the moment margins are most compressed. Expanding operating margins is not preparation for future investment: it is the mechanism that makes it possible.

IADS notes: Recent industry analyses confirm the direction: reliance on technology and operational simplicity to achieve cost efficiency without sacrificing revenue momentum has replaced blunt cost-cutting as the primary margin lever (Journal du Net, January 2026). Evidence is accumulating that operational discipline, not revenue scale, is the more reliable driver of shareholder returns (Harvard Business Review, January 2026). That matters acutely now: retail CEOs are maintaining or increasing AI investment commitments even as full-scale returns remain elusive for most (The Wall Street Journal, December 2025). Project-driven, cross-functional structures are enabling organisations to rotate talent and priorities faster than traditional hierarchy allows, which is the organisational condition that sustained margin improvement requires (Harvard Business Review, January 2026). Retailers moving fastest on AI are already reporting gains in markdown reduction, scheduling efficiency, and procurement cost, powered by domain-specific models built for retail operations rather than general-purpose tools (Forbes, January 2026).

How retailers can improve operating margins to drive shareholder returns

What: India’s e-retail sector is experiencing rapid growth, driven by digital innovation, shifting consumer habits, and increased competition among domestic and international players.

Why it is important: The sector’s evolution demonstrates how innovation and regulatory shifts are redefining competitiveness in one of the world’s largest retail markets.

India’s online retail market is undergoing a profound transformation as digital adoption accelerates and consumer preferences evolve. The sector is witnessing a surge in immersive and intelligent shopping experiences, with omni-channel and digital-first models becoming central to growth strategies. This shift is particularly pronounced in Tier II and III cities, where rising affluence and a younger, more digitally savvy population are driving new patterns of discretionary spending. Leading e-commerce platforms and international brands are expanding rapidly, leveraging local partnerships and data-driven insights to navigate the complexities of the Indian market. The competitive landscape is intensifying, with both domestic and global players innovating to capture market share through personalised engagement and seamless online-offline integration. Meanwhile, regulatory developments and the push for greater market access are shaping the strategies of giants like Amazon and Flipkart, further fueling the sector’s dynamism. As a result, India’s e-retail industry is setting new benchmarks for growth, adaptability, and consumer-centric innovation.

IADS Notes: India’s e-retail sector is entering a transformative era, marked by rapid digital adoption, evolving consumer preferences, and intensified competition among both domestic and international players. Immersive and intelligent consumer experiences are at the core of this growth, with omni-channel and digital-first models becoming essential for capturing new segments, particularly in Tier II and III cities (Deloitte/Google, April 2026). The sector’s projected expansion to a ₹200 trillion market by 2035 is underpinned by demographic shifts, including the rise of affluent households and the growing influence of Gen Z and women, which are driving discretionary spending and shaping new retail experiences (BCG, February 2026). International and luxury brands are accelerating their expansion, leveraging omni-channel strategies and local partnerships to reach a broader, digitally savvy consumer base (The Robin Report, January 2026). The transformation of Indian malls into hybrid, experience-driven destinations reflects the sector’s adaptation to the convenience and speed demanded by e-commerce (ET Retail, August 2025). Regulatory developments, such as the push for greater market access for global giants like Amazon and Walmart’s Flipkart, further illustrate the dynamic and competitive landscape shaping India’s online retail future (Financial Times, April 2025).

How India Shops Online 2026 Report

What: The airport retail model is evolving into a “compressed economy,” where cross-sector collaboration, placemaking, and data-driven experiences drive engagement and revenue from a context-rich, time-bound customer base.

Why it is important: As airports become platforms for immersive, context-rich experiences, they set a blueprint for how retailers can innovate beyond traditional sector boundaries to capture discretionary spend.

Airports are emerging as some of the most dynamic and innovative commercial environments, embodying the concept of a “compressed economy” where retail, hospitality, media, finance, and travel converge around a single, highly engaged customer. No longer just transit hubs, leading airports like Singapore’s Jewel Changi and London Heathrow are being reimagined as mixed-use, experiential districts that monetize dwell time and premium attention through curated brand activations, luxury boutiques, lounges, wellness spaces, and immersive media. The integration of data-driven personalization, cross-sector partnerships, and premium services enables airports to deliver context-rich, time-bound experiences that maximize engagement and revenue. This model is driving record sales in duty-free and travel retail, with airports accounting for over 8% of global luxury retail revenue and $1 billion in monthly duty-free sales in Europe. As airports become platforms for collaboration and innovation, they offer a blueprint for how retailers can break out of traditional sector silos, leverage customer context, and create new value propositions in an increasingly post-sector world.

IADS Notes: Airports are rapidly evolving into mixed-use, experiential destinations where commerce, culture, and community converge, as detailed by The Robin Report in May 2026. Placemaking, experiential retail, and cultural integration are now central to airport commercial strategies, with projects like Jewel Changi in Singapore and luxury concepts such as Louis Vuitton’s café at Heathrow setting new benchmarks for engagement and brand loyalty. Inside Retail in September 2025 highlights how Asia’s airport retail boom is anchoring regional tourism and retail expansion, with curated brand mixes and immersive shopping experiences driving the global travel retail market toward $121.09 billion by 2029. South China Morning Post in February 2026 documents how Chinese shoppers have become the leading spenders in Asia’s airport retail sector, prompting airports and brands to rethink strategies with a greater emphasis on luxury, experiential offerings, and digital innovation. Forbes in January 2026 notes that Europe’s airport duty-free sector now generates $1 billion in monthly sales, but warns of the growing importance of regulatory agility and strategic foresight as the sector faces increased scrutiny. India Retailing in August 2025 underscores the strategic value of airport locations for department stores like Shoppers Stop, which are leveraging travel retail to capture high-value consumer segments and drive premiumisation. Collectively, these sources illustrate that the future of airport retail lies in creating culturally resonant, digitally integrated, and experience-led environments that serve as both commercial and community anchors, driving long-term growth and relevance in the travel and retail sectors.

Airports are the best example of compressed economy

What: AI-powered sales companions are enabling brands in emerging markets to extract more from existing distribution networks — with early adopters reporting 11–25% gains in sales and customer-facing time without expanding headcount.

Why it is important: AI is driving measurable gains in sales channel efficiency, but only companies that integrate it into core workflows — rather than treating it as a parallel system — are sustaining those results.

A salesperson visiting 20 to 25 stores a day now gets AI-generated route plans, real-time conversation analysis, and store-specific product recommendations on their phone — all in the local vernacular. BCG's April 2026 analysis argues this is the next productivity lever for brands in emerging markets, as traditional distribution models reach their limits amid saturated shelf space and rising SKU counts. AI companions draw on both structured and unstructured data — billing records, store images, handwritten notes, and sales conversations — to deliver recommendations that adapt to each outlet's size, location, and purchase history. Early results are measurable: one mid-size homecare brand saw an 11% increase in sales within a month; a multinational CPG player achieved a 25% rise in customer-facing time and 8% more product lines sold per call. Realising that potential requires clear use-case prioritisation, a connected data and technology stack, and the commitment to redesign workflows rather than layer tools onto existing ones. Companies must also address data quality, privacy, and security — without which recommendations lose accuracy and frontline teams revert to manual defaults. Those who do are the ones most likely to reach the 15–20% sales growth BCG identifies as the upside.

IADS Notes: The BCG article's perspective is reinforced by recent industry analysis, including BCG (April 2026) on the persistent gap between executive ambition and operational reality in AI adoption, Retail Touchpoints (January 2026) and The Robin Report (April 2026) on the measurable gains from agentic AI models, and Forbes (October 2025) and BCG (February 2026) on the need for workforce upskilling and operating model redesign. Harvard Business Review (April 2026) and Deloitte (September 2025) further highlight that sustained value from AI depends on security guardrails, adaptive governance, and systematic change management as adoption accelerates.

How AI can reshape distributed sales channels in emerging markets

What: Gen Z faces an “AI encouragement gap” as they enter a workforce marked by limited support for AI adoption, gender disparities, and economic pressures that reshape their retail behaviors.

Why it is important: The intersection of generational, gender, and economic divides is accelerating changes in retail, requiring new strategies for employee engagement and consumer connection.

The article explores the widening “AI encouragement gap” affecting Gen Z as they enter the workforce, particularly in retail. Despite being highly adept with technology, Gen Z employees receive little support or encouragement from older, less tech-savvy managers, leading to a disconnect that stifles innovation and productivity. This gap is compounded by gender disparities, with women less likely to receive AI training or encouragement, risking further underrepresentation in technology-driven roles. Economic pressures, including high personal debt and stagnant wages, are forcing Gen Z to adopt more critical and frugal consumption habits, redefining what they consider necessities and prioritizing value and authenticity over traditional luxury. These factors are reshaping retail both in terms of workforce dynamics and consumer trends, as younger generations seek individuality and meaningful experiences rather than material status symbols. The combined impact of limited AI support, gender bias, and financial constraints is driving a fundamental transformation in how retailers must approach both talent development and customer engagement.

IADS Notes: The “AI encouragement gap” and its effects are echoed in recent industry research. As of January 2026, Gallup and BCG report that only a third of retail employees use AI, with daily use even lower, highlighting persistent generational and organizational divides. ESG Dive (January 2026) notes that while AI is creating new opportunities for women, gaps in training and advancement remain. Economic pressures, as documented by WWD (May 2025), Visa (January 2026), and PwC (September 2025), are prompting Gen Z to redefine necessities and cut discretionary spending. Meanwhile, Forbes and The Robin Report (early 2026) show that Gen Z’s focus on individuality and authenticity is reshaping retail, with a shift toward unique experiences and digital engagement over traditional consumption.

There’s an AI encouragement gap

What: Companies are seeing limited returns from AI in customer service because disconnected workflows and siloed data undermine efficiency and satisfaction.

Why it is important: As AI-driven engagement becomes standard, organisations that fail to unify data and workflows risk falling behind more integrated competitors.

Adding AI to fragmented systems does not solve customer service problems; it often makes them worse. Despite heavy investment in AI and CRM, many organisations still face high rates of customer frustration and churn, with consumers spending excessive time resolving issues and nearly half willing to switch brands after a poor experience. The core issue is disconnected workflows and siloed data, which prevent AI from delivering seamless service. Traditional CRM systems record customer requests but rarely provide a complete view across departments, forcing customers to repeat themselves and agents to juggle multiple tools. A connected CRM that unifies data, teams, and processes is essential for enabling AI to resolve issues efficiently and autonomously. Only by integrating systems and breaking down silos can organisations empower agents, reduce administrative work, and deliver the seamless experiences customers expect.

IADS Notes: Recent industry analyses show that fragmented, siloed systems are a major barrier to effective AI in customer service. This article’s argument—that AI layered onto disconnected CRM platforms increases customer frustration—is echoed by January 2026 findings, which highlight a widening gap between consumer expectations and company strategies as most brands fail to adapt their systems for AI-driven engagement. Forbes in October 2025 confirms that the benefits of AI agents depend on governance and organisational redesign, with fragmented workflows limiting results. Retail Touchpoints in January 2026 reports that only 10% of companies have scaled domain-specific AI models, citing persistent integration and data silos as key obstacles. Modern Retail’s March 2026 research underscores that improvements in efficiency and customer experience depend on data quality, alignment, and training—challenges made worse by disconnected systems. July 2025 reporting shows that agentic AI, when combined with unified data and workflows, can deliver up to 30% improvements in service efficiency and more personalised customer experiences.

When AI learns to feel: towards a new era of customer engagement

What: Agentic commerce, powered by AI-driven agents, is fundamentally reshaping retail strategy by shifting decision-making and discoverability from consumers to autonomous systems.

Why it is important: The adoption of AI-driven agents is redefining competitive advantage in retail, forcing brands to adapt their infrastructure and engagement strategies to remain visible and relevant.

Agentic commerce is rapidly altering the foundations of retail strategy as AI-powered agents increasingly take over roles traditionally held by consumers, such as product discovery and purchasing decisions. This shift means that retailers can no longer rely solely on traditional marketing or brand loyalty to drive sales. Instead, success now depends on the ability to optimise data quality, transparency, and interoperability with autonomous systems. Retailers must adapt their digital infrastructure and engagement models to ensure their products are easily discoverable and preferred by AI agents, which are becoming the primary gatekeepers of consumer choice. The article highlights that this transformation is not a distant prospect but an immediate challenge, requiring urgent strategic shifts. Retailers who fail to respond risk losing relevance as AI agents prioritise brands that are agent-ready, transparent, and capable of delivering personalised experiences. The evolution of agentic commerce is thus setting new standards for competition, discoverability, and customer relationship management in the retail industry.

IADS Notes: Agentic commerce is rapidly transforming the retail landscape, as highlighted in recent industry analyses. The April 2026 BCG report underscores that retailers must prepare for multiple AI-driven futures, with data governance and agent-ready APIs now essential for commercial success. Forbes in February 2026 emphasizes the urgency for retailers to adapt their strategies and technologies, as consumers increasingly delegate purchasing decisions to AI agents, demanding hyper-personalisation and robust privacy measures. McKinsey’s November 2025 analysis details how AI agents are mediating transactions and redefining value creation, compelling retailers to overhaul business models and digital infrastructure. Journal du Net in September 2025 further illustrates the shift of power from brands to tech giants, as AI agents automate e-commerce and reshape customer relationships. The cumulative message from these sources is clear: agentic commerce is not a distant trend but an immediate reality, requiring retailers to rethink discoverability, loyalty, and operational agility to remain relevant in an AI-mediated marketplace.

How agentic commerce is rewriting retail strategy

What: Retailers face escalating cyber threats from AI-driven innovation, requiring urgent updates to security and board oversight.

Why it is important: The evolving threat landscape demonstrates that only retailers with robust oversight and adaptive strategies can sustain growth and customer trust.

AI is rapidly transforming the retail sector, driving operational efficiency and customer engagement while simultaneously introducing a new spectrum of cyber risks. As retailers deploy advanced AI systems to optimize everything from supply chains to customer service, the speed of technological adoption is outpacing the development of effective cybersecurity measures. This imbalance has left the majority of retailers vulnerable to sophisticated attacks, such as prompt injection and AI agent manipulation, which can compromise sensitive data and disrupt operations without traditional hacking methods. Boards and executive leadership are now under pressure to strengthen governance frameworks, implement real-time monitoring, and ensure comprehensive staff training to address these evolving risks. Regulatory scrutiny is also intensifying, particularly around algorithmic pricing and the ethical use of customer data, compelling retailers to prioritise transparency and responsible AI deployment. Ultimately, the sector’s ability to sustain growth and maintain customer trust will depend on its capacity to integrate robust security, adaptive governance, and ethical innovation in an increasingly complex digital environment.

IADS Notes: In March 2026, RH-ISAC reported that only 18% of retailers have achieved mature digital core security, highlighting a widening gap between AI innovation and cybersecurity preparedness. That same month, Harvard Business Review emphasised the risks posed by AI agents that can be manipulated like malware, underscoring the need for real-time monitoring and robust governance. The Robin Report in August 2025 detailed the vulnerability of retail AI systems to prompt injection attacks, which can compromise operations without traditional hacking. INSEAD’s January 2026 analysis noted that while board-level oversight is increasingly essential, many retailers still struggle to unlock the full value of AI due to organisational and leadership challenges. Finally, Forbes in December 2025 examined how regulatory developments around algorithmic pricing and surveillance are compelling retailers to balance technological innovation with transparency and ethical responsibility.

AI Is reshaping cyber risk. Boards need to manage the threat.

What: The latest Gallup report reveals that falling manager engagement is the primary driver of a global productivity decline — arriving at the same moment AI is reshaping how organisations expect work to get done

Why it is important: For retailers, the finding is specific: management quality, not technology spend, determines whether AI adoption improves performance. The data from 2025 show the gap clearly.

The Gallup “State of the Global Workplace” 2025 report highlights a critical inflexion point for organisations worldwide, as global employee engagement has fallen to 21%, with manager engagement dropping even more sharply. This decline is particularly concerning given the simultaneous acceleration of AI and digital transformation across industries, including retail. The report identifies managers as the linchpin of team engagement, noting that 70% of team engagement is attributable to the manager’s influence. However, managers themselves are increasingly disengaged and experiencing declines in well-being, especially among younger and female leaders. The consequences are significant: disengaged managers lead to disengaged teams, resulting in lost productivity, increased absenteeism, and higher turnover. Gallup estimates that if global engagement were maximised, it could add $9.6 trillion to the world economy. The report calls for urgent investment in manager training, effective coaching, and ongoing development to reverse these trends. Ultimately, the findings underscore that the future of work—and retail competitiveness—depends on empowering managers to harness AI’s potential while maintaining strong human connections.

IADS Notes: The Gallup report’s findings on declining global engagement, particularly among managers, and the urgent need for leadership-driven transformation are strongly echoed in recent retail industry analyses. Throughout 2025 and early 2026, sources such as BCG, Forbes, and Gallup have consistently highlighted that while AI adoption is widespread in retail, only a minority of companies—about 10%—have managed to scale these solutions effectively, with leadership engagement, workflow redesign, and systematic upskilling emerging as critical success factors (Jan 2026, Mar 2026, Jul 2025). The persistent gap between digital ambition and operational reality is underscored by the fact that just 36% of retail workers feel prepared for AI-driven change, despite 72% using AI tools regularly. Regional differences in engagement and job market perceptions, as detailed in the Gallup report, are mirrored in retail, where adaptive workforce planning and skills-based talent management are increasingly vital for resilience. Furthermore, the decline in employee engagement and wellbeing is directly linked to productivity and profitability challenges, with recent Gallup and Retail Bulletin analyses warning that detachment and burnout threaten both customer satisfaction and long-term business performance (Feb 2026, May 2025). Ultimately, the convergence of these findings demonstrates that the future of retail will depend on visionary leadership, robust management practices, and a balanced approach to AI integration that prioritizes both technological innovation and human potential.

State of the Global Workplace - 2026 report

What: The next wave of $250 billion commerce growth is being driven by inspired, immersive, instant, and intelligent consumer experiences, with India at the forefront of this transformation.

Why it is important: India’s transformation demonstrates the strategic value of adapting to evolving consumer behaviours and leveraging omni-channel and digital-first models.

India’s retail sector is entering a period of extraordinary growth, fuelled by a convergence of inspired, immersive, instant, and intelligent consumer experiences. The report highlights how digital transformation, demographic shifts, and the rise of affluent, younger consumers are reshaping the market landscape. Retailers are increasingly adopting omni-channel strategies and digital-first models to capture new segments, particularly in Tier II and III cities, where international brands and local players are competing for market share. The integration of immersive technologies and content-driven commerce is redefining how consumers discover and engage with products, while agile supply chains and rapid fulfillment are setting new expectations for convenience and service. This dynamic environment is creating significant opportunities for brands that can adapt quickly, optimise logistics, and deliver personalized, engaging experiences. As India leads this next wave of commerce, the ability to anticipate and respond to evolving consumer behaviours will be critical for sustained growth and competitive advantage.

IADS Notes: The $250 billion commerce frontier is being shaped by a convergence of inspired, immersive, instant, and intelligent forces, as detailed in the April 2026 Deloitte and Google report. This growth is underpinned by India’s rapid retail evolution, with BCG and the Retailers Association of India in February 2026 projecting a ₹200 trillion market by 2035, driven by digital transformation, demographic shifts, and the rise of affluent and younger consumers. The Robin Report in January 2026 highlights how international brands and local players are leveraging omni-channel strategies and digital adoption to capture new segments, especially in Tier II and III cities. Journal du Net’s January 2026 analysis underscores the strategic importance of logistics innovation, with agile supply chains and seamless returns enabling the instant commerce and rapid fulfilment that consumers now expect. Meanwhile, BCG’s June 2025 research reveals that inspiration-driven shopping, particularly through digital and creator-led video content, is significantly influencing purchase decisions, reinforcing the need for retailers to integrate content and commerce to capture growth in this dynamic market.

The $250 billion commerce frontier

What: Inclusion has become a baseline expectation, requiring brands to embed it across products, experiences, and leadership.

Why it is important: This shift reflects the fact that consumer loyalty and business performance now depend on meaningful, consistent inclusion, as seen in recent industry data.

Inclusion is no longer a differentiator but a fundamental expectation for organisations, as highlighted at Seramount’s Culture Fuels Creativity event. Leaders from various sectors emphasised that both consumers and employees now judge brands by the consistency of their inclusive practices, not just by isolated campaigns or statements. Data shows that a significant portion of consumers, especially among younger and diverse demographics, base their purchasing decisions on how well brands reflect their values and identities. The discussion underscored the need for intentionality, urging organisations to design products, services, and experiences with diverse communities from the outset, rather than retrofitting solutions after gaps appear. Global organisations face the added challenge of balancing consistency with local relevance, requiring flexible yet principled approaches. Technology, particularly AI, was identified as both a risk and an opportunity, depending on how inclusively it is developed and governed. Ultimately, the article argues that inclusion must be operationalised throughout every aspect of an organisation to build 

IADS Notes: The retail and consumer landscape is rapidly evolving as inclusion becomes an operational imperative, with frameworks like FAIR guiding this shift (January 2026). Brands that authentically align with diverse consumer realities, such as E.l.f. Beauty and Gap, are seeing increased loyalty and growth (October 2025). Retailers are embedding accessibility and inclusive design into their offerings, moving beyond generic solutions for greater impact (July 2025). Global companies are tailoring inclusion strategies to local contexts while maintaining enterprise-wide goals (March 2026). As technology and AI become central to operations, inclusion leaders are ensuring ethical, transparent, and fair development to protect trust and opportunity (February 2026).

How leaders are redefining inclusion

What: The “refund effect” enables retailers to capture discretionary spending by aligning marketing and return policies with consumer psychology during periods of increased liquidity.

Why it is important: Leveraging the refund effect aligns with the shift toward value-driven, targeted promotions and trust-based policies that have proven effective in boosting both sales and loyalty.

The article explores how retailers can strategically capitalise on the “refund effect”—the surge in discretionary spending that follows windfalls like tax refunds—by aligning their marketing, promotions, and return policies with consumer psychology. It highlights that consumers perceive refunds as “found money,” making them more willing to indulge in non-essential purchases and respond positively to targeted offers. Retailers who understand these psychological triggers can design campaigns that encourage higher-value purchases and foster loyalty, especially during periods when consumers feel temporarily wealthier. The piece emphasises the importance of data-driven marketing, suggesting that personalised promotions and timely messaging can significantly enhance conversion rates during refund seasons. Additionally, the article discusses the role of flexible return policies in reducing purchase hesitation, noting that trust-based approaches, such as “returnless returns,” can strengthen customer relationships and drive repeat business. By leveraging these insights, retailers can not only boost short-term sales but also build lasting loyalty, positioning themselves advantageously in an increasingly competitive and value-conscious market.

IADS Notes: The “refund effect” described in the article is highly relevant in today’s retail landscape, as recent economic and consumer trends underscore the importance of capturing discretionary spending triggered by windfalls such as tax refunds. In January 2026, The Economist highlighted how anticipated tax cuts and government spending are expected to inject liquidity into the U.S. economy, supporting retail sales and encouraging more agile retailer strategies. This aligns with the resilience seen in July 2025, when Forbes reported that retail sales exceeded expectations despite economic headwinds, with consumers adapting their spending patterns. The 2025 holiday season, as analysed by Placer.ai in December 2025, further demonstrated a decisive shift toward value-driven shopping, with targeted promotions and the excitement of discovery driving engagement at discount and off-price retailers. Retail Week’s October 2025 coverage revealed that AI-powered search and data-driven promotions are now central to maximizing sales during peak periods, reflecting a broader industry pivot toward personalised marketing. Finally, Forbes in July 2025 emphasised the psychological underpinnings of consumer behaviour, showing that trust-based returns policies can transform transactional relationships into lasting loyalty, a principle that retailers can leverage during refund-driven spending surges.

How retailers can capitalise on the “refund effect”

PRINTABLE VERSION HERE 

CLICK HERE TO SEE PHOTOS OF ZARA BOUTIQUES!

Zara is, by any measure, the archetype of fast fashion. No other brand has done more to define the model: rapid design cycles, vertically integrated supply chains, relentless store expansion. The parent company, Inditex, is valued among Europe’s most capitalised corporations.

Yet something has shifted. Over the past five years, Zara has been reinventing what its stores look and feel like, how they operate, and what they aspire to be. Flagship after flagship, the brand has moved toward larger, locally rooted, experientially rich formats that blur the line between monobrand retail and something that looks remarkably like a department store. The prices remain accessible; the ambition does not.

As the recent flagship openings documented by Newstores, IADS’ retail observation partner, illustrate, this evolution deserves more than a passing glance from department store leaders. Zara is not merely a competitor occupying adjacent real estate in prime urban locations. It is, arguably, the most disciplined and best-capitalised retailer currently converging on the department store’s own territory — in format, in positioning, and in the role it seeks to play in cities. Understanding how it got there, and where it is heading, is not an exercise in competitive anxiety. It is an opportunity to ask what department stores can learn, where they must differentiate, and what they should refuse to concede.

How Zara became a global retail powerhouse

The story began in 1963, when Amancio Ortega, then a delivery boy, founded Confecciones GOA in La Coruña to manufacture women’s bathrobes and lingerie for local retailers, by copying popular designs and selling them at accessible prices. The pivot came in 1975 when a customer cancelled a large order, forcing Ortega to open a store to sell the stock himself.

The inaugural collection featured white blouses and shirts inspired by American preppy style, marketed as fashionable “high-end lookalikes” at prices ordinary Spaniards could afford. The business model was new: Ortega controlled everything from design to retail, eliminating intermediaries. Success came quickly. By 1983, there were nine Zara stores across Spain, and in 1984 the company opened a logistics centre near La Coruña, enabling frequent, small, just-in-time deliveries to stores.

In 1985, Ortega formalised this growing empire by creating Inditex (Industria de Diseño Textil) as the holding company for all operations, built on rapid fashion cycles, tight supply-chain control, and the ability to test, learn, and iterate fast. The brand portfolio expanded through the acquisition or launch of Pull&Bear (1991), Massimo Dutti (1991–94), and Bershka (1998). Yet Zara remained the volume driver and image engine of the group, growing internationally: Portugal in 1988, New York in 1989, Paris in 1990, as a prelude to broader European expansion in the 1990s and Mexico City (1992). By the decade’s end, Zara had entered the Middle East, Latin America, Turkey and Japan, reaching approximately 1,000 retail locations.

In 2001, Inditex listed on the Spanish stock exchange at a valuation of €9 billion; shares surged on the first day, making Ortega Spain’s richest person overnight. The listing funded aggressive growth strategy in Asia, and by 2009, Zara operated in 69 countries, with a store count surpassing 2,000.

By then, Zara had become synonymous with fast fashion itself: global scale, twice-weekly store deliveries, lead times of just a few weeks from design to the shop floor, and a distinctive sourcing strategy. While competitors moved production entirely to Asia for cost savings, Zara maintained approximately 50% of production in “proximity markets”—Spain, Portugal, Morocco, and Turkey—for trendy, fast-turning items, reserving Asian production for basics with longer lead times. This dual-speed supply chain allowed Zara to react to emerging trends mid-season while competitors were locked into collections planned six months in advance.

Operational sophistication went hand in hand with technology. From 2013 to 2015, Zara implemented RFID tagging across its entire network, enabling individual garment tracking, improved stock visibility, click-and-collect services and self-checkout. E-commerce launched in 2010 in six European markets with a deliberately simple interface. A mobile app followed shortly after, and by 2013, online sales had expanded to 106 countries. Today, e-commerce is available in 200 markets through the website, app or partners. At the group level, online accounts for more than a quarter of total sales, with 218 million active app users, 8.1 billion annual visits, and 257 million social media followers — Zara being the primary driver of engagement.

In 2011, Amancio Ortega stepped down as CEO, handing the reins to Pablo Isla. Under his leadership, Inditex reached its peak store count in 2019 with 2,139 locations. The COVID-19 pandemic hit hard: sales fell 44% year-on-year, resulting in a €409 million net loss as store closures were not offset by a 50% surge in online sales in Q1 (however, the company posted a total €1.1 bn net profit for the full year 2020). Inditex responded with massive investment — approximately €2.7 billion in technology and store integration — while earmarking 600+ stores for closure between 2020 and 2024 in China, Spain, France and Germany. The philosophy shifted from maximising store count to a “fewer, larger, better” flagship strategy.

In 2021, Óscar García Maceiras succeeded Isla as CEO, and in 2022, Marta Ortega Pérez—the founder’s daughter—became Non-Executive Chair. Under her influence, Zara began repositioning toward a more premium, “fashion house” identity rather than pure fast-fashion volume play. This translated into price increases in 2023 (without significant customer defection—a sharp contrast to struggles faced by competitors like H&M and Uniqlo with similar moves), designer collaborations (Stefano Pilati, Ludovic de Saint Sernin, Narciso Rodríguez), and a new visual language through the works of fashion photographers like Steven Meisel and Mario Sorrenti. Curation and quality took precedence over sheer speed and volume.

Brand extensions accompanied this repositioning. Zara Beauty launched in May 2021 and expanded into hair care by 2025. Zara Pre-Owned debuted in 2022, offering repair, resale, and donation services as part of sustainability initiatives aimed at luring younger consumers.

Technology investments continued to transform operations — soft-tag RFID now deployed in 100% of stores (and set to cover 90% of products across all formats by Spring/Summer 2026), AI-driven demand forecasting and trend detection, logistics automation and a major new distribution centre near Zaragoza scheduled to open in mid-2026. Online, Zara has introduced an AI-based virtual fitting tool (”Zara Try-on”) that allows customers to generate a synthetic avatar from their own photos and see it wearing real products — already deployed in 43 markets with over 7 million sessions since launch in late 2025. But the most visible changes were in the flagship stores themselves, which became laboratories for customer experience innovation. The Manchester Trafford Centre store (3,200+ sqm) featured automated sorters, assisted checkouts and in-store repair booking. The expanded Hudson Yards location in Manhattan (2,200 sqm) and the Nanjing flagship (2,500+ sqm) showcased Zacaffè — Zara’s in-store café concept — alongside “Fit Check” smart mirrors and apparel vending machines. The Osaka store (2,040 sqm, the 64th in Japan) demonstrated that even in mature markets, Zara saw value in enhanced physical experiences.

Zara stores today: why they matter to department stores

The brand remains the crown jewel of the Inditex group, which also operates Pull&Bear, Massimo Dutti, Bershka, Stradivarius, Oysho. Under the group’s current reporting structure, Zara, Zara Home and Lefties together generated €28.1 billion in FY2025 (year ending January 2026, and up from €27,8 billion in 2024), representing 70% of Inditex’s total revenue of €39.9 billion. As of January 2026, Zara operates 1,500 stores globally — down from 1,550 a year earlier — while total selling space for the Zara cluster grew to 3.18 million sq m (+1.3%), confirming the “fewer, larger, better” thesis. At the group level, gross space increased 5.3% in the year, and the financial trajectory continues to strengthen.

The newest stores are organised into semi-independent sections — women, men, kids, fragrances, Zara Origins, Zara Athleticz — each with its own visual identity but unified by a coherent overall architecture. Technology is embedded throughout: RFID-enabled inventory, interactive fitting-room mirrors, self-checkout, and dedicated areas for online pickup and returns. Each store acts as a mini fulfilment hub, raising complexity in labour planning, backroom capacity and service design.

Flagships aim to become destinations. Experiential elements — cafés, immersive displays — blend retail, hospitality and services. They are increasingly referred to as “monobrand department stores” due to their size and scope. Meanwhile, peripheral or smaller stores, especially in mature European markets, continue to be consolidated in favour of productivity per square metre over maximum coverage.

Zara’s store fleet is converging toward a smaller number of highly invested flagship “magnets”, often in the same urban nodes as department stores, competing for fashion traffic while potentially driving broader footfall to premium retail districts. Fully integrated into the digital ecosystem through their fulfilment and experience capabilities, these flagships also serve as physical engagement funnels for Zara’s online business.

Department store leaders can therefore view Zara both as a competitor and as a benchmark: a vertically integrated, data-rich fashion machine that is deliberately reducing its physical footprint while upgrading every remaining location into a highly choreographed, omnichannel-enabled flagship. Like department stores, Zara is seeking to escape the Shein/Temu low-price race by moving upmarket without alienating its core customers — through improved brand image, upgraded store concepts and elevated décor.

What recent flagship openings reveal: four signals for department stores

Between 2024 and 2026, IADS’ partner Newstores documented a series of notable Zara openings and relocations across Europe and Japan, including the expansion of the standalone Zara Man format — now in its fourth location. Taken individually, each is a well-executed store. Taken together, they tell a far more consequential story: Zara is methodically building the capabilities, aesthetics, and spatial logic that have historically been the preserve of department stores. Four patterns stand out.

The “rooms” logic: a monobrand department store in all but name

Walk into the relocated Zara in Manchester’s Trafford Centre (3,000+ sq m on a single floor) or the new Leeds flagship (4,300 sq m across three floors) and the layout is immediately striking: instead of one continuous selling floor, the space is broken into a sequence of distinct rooms — a baby boutique here, an accessories and handbags shop-in-shop there, each with its own visual register. Newstores’ John Ryan described the Trafford store as “a mall within a mall“. The same principle is at work in Yokohama, where the relocated 2,000 sq m store is organised as a series of boutique-style rooms, with tonal and lighting shifts demarcating womenswear, menswear and younger fashion. Even the more compact standalone Zara Man formats follow this grammar: the recently opened 700 sq m Berlin store in the Mall of Berlin — the fourth standalone Zara Man after Osaka, Rome and South Coast Plaza — is designed as a series of linked rooms across two floors, with Zara Athleticz given its own separate entrance from the mall.

This is, of course, the foundational spatial grammar of the department store: curated worlds under one roof, each with its own identity, connected by a coherent architectural envelope. Zara is now applying it — at scale, under a single brand — in the very retail districts where department stores operate.

Local roots as a premium signal

One of the most striking shifts in recent Zara flagships is the deliberate rejection of a standardised global format in favour of deep contextual anchoring.

In Lisbon, the 5,000 sq m store occupying an entire block on Rossio Square preserves the character of the original building, lending the interior — especially the Zara Home floor — a distinctly Portuguese domestic atmosphere35. The in-store café is a partnership with a local pastéis de nata atelier: a reference that no global playbook could have prescribed. In Madrid, the reopened Calle Serrano flagship deploys an interpretation of Castilian architecture — exposed brick, reclaimed wood, iron and ceramics — with a graduated lighting scheme (darker below, brighter above) that choreographs the vertical journey through the building. The fourth floor hosts “El Apartamento”, a 400 sq m space designed as a curated domestic setting blending Zara Home and clothing36.

In Japan, Zara goes further still. The Osaka Zara Man store wraps its façade in burnt cedar, furnishes the interior with Sunuke wood and antique Japanese chairs, and includes a “Listening Room” where customers can sit and listen to music from custom-designed speakers37. In Barcelona, the new Diagonal flagship — designed with Vincent Van Duysen — inhabits one of the avenue’s traditional buildings, using brushed metal, natural wood, soft stone and exposed timber beams to create what Newstores calls “a restrained sense of luxury“ at mid-market prices38.

For department store leaders, the parallel is direct: the ability to be of a city, not just in it, has long been a defining advantage of the format — think Harrods in London, Le Bon Marché in Paris, or Isetan in Tokyo Shinjuku. Zara is now investing heavily in precisely that kind of local resonance, store by store.

Luxury codes at mid-market prices

Barcelona’s Diagonal flagship raises a question that should preoccupy every department store CEO positioning in the premium segment. As Newstores pointedly observed: what can mid-market competitors be doing when their interiors begin to match — or surpass — those of luxury merchants?

The Madrid Serrano store is explicitly designed to feel like it “fringes on luxury“, a deliberate departure from Zara’s familiar cream-and-brushed-metal aesthetic. In Osaka, the Zara Man store uses Spanish artworks, sculpture and a vintage motorcycle as props — the visual vocabulary of a concept boutique, not a volume retailer. In Berlin, the new standalone Zara Man deploys a palette of black, steel and plain light wood under a blacked-out open ceiling, with a sculptural matt-black staircase linking the two floors — a deliberately minimalist environment in which a restrained number of garments are on display, reinforcing the sense of curation over volume. In Barcelona, the Van Duysen collaboration produces an interior of such restraint and material quality that, absent the price tags, it could pass for a high-end maison.

This is the tangible translation of Marta Ortega’s repositioning: designer collaborations, fashion-house photography, controlled price increases absorbed without meaningful customer defection. The flagships are where the strategy becomes tangible. And for department stores that compete on curation, environment and brand elevation, the gap is narrowing — not because department stores are declining, but because Zara is ascending.

The store as omnichannel infrastructure

Beneath the design ambition, these flagships are also logistical machines. In Yokohama, customers can scan items to check in-store availability, use digital readers to locate products on the floor, and pick up online orders from a robotic pickup point. In Manchester’s Trafford Centre, 20 “assisted checkout” desks replace conventional tills entirely, with contactless payment as the default39. These are not add-ons, they are structural to the store concept.

Combined with RFID-tagged inventory, ship-from-store capabilities, and dedicated online pickup and return zones, each flagship operates as a fulfilment hub that also serves as a beautifully designed retail space. This dual function — experience venue and logistics node — is one that department stores have been pursuing for years, but that Zara now executes with the advantage of vertical integration and a single-brand product architecture that radically simplifies operations.

For department stores: competitor, benchmark, or mirror?

The conventional framing positions Zara as a competitor to department stores. It occupies the same prime urban locations, targets overlapping customer segments, and increasingly deploys the same tools: curated environments, local architectural identity, hospitality elements, omnichannel fulfilment. In cities like Manchester, Madrid, Barcelona, or Osaka, Zara flagships now sit next door to — and sometimes outperform — department stores in terms of design ambition, technological sophistication, and footfall. The competitive overlap is real and growing.

Yet the more instructive lens may be that of the benchmark. Zara’s trajectory over the past five years offers department store leaders something rarer and more valuable than a threat assessment: a live case study in strategic reinvention under pressure.

What department stores can learn

Faced with the twin squeeze of ultra-fast-fashion platforms undercutting on price and speed, and a post-pandemic consumer expecting more from physical retail, Zara did not retreat into either discount volume or digital-only efficiency. Instead, it made a series of decisions that department store CEOs will recognise as familiar ambitions — but that Zara executed with a speed, coherence and capital commitment that few multibrand retailers have matched:

• It shrank to grow: From a peak of 2,139 stores in 2019 to 1,500 in 2026, Zara closed over 600 locations while increasing total commercial space. Every closure funded a larger, better-positioned flagship. Department stores have been debating portfolio rationalisation for years; Zara did it, absorbing the short-term pain and emerging with a more productive, more investable estate.
•  It moved upmarket without losing its base: Price increases in 2023, designer collaborations, fashion-house photography, new store concepts — all signalled a deliberate premiumisation. Yet customer defection remained minimal because the repositioning was grounded in tangible improvements to product and experience, not mere aspiration, and simultaneously customers can still shop access price items. Department stores attempting similar moves — elevating private labels, introducing premium services, curating more selectively — often struggle with the execution gap between intention and perception. Zara closed it.
• It made technology invisible: RFID, AI-driven demand forecasting, robotic pick-up, assisted checkouts, in-store product locators — the technological stack in a Zara flagship is formidable. But none of it is presented as innovation theatre. It simply works, quietly, in the background of a beautifully designed space. This stands in contrast to some department store technology investments, where digital screens and interactive installations can feel bolted on rather than woven in.
•  It turned stores into stories: The burnt cedar façade in Osaka, the pastéis de nata café in Lisbon, the “Apartamento” in Madrid, the Listening Room — these are not gimmicks. They are narrative devices that give each flagship a reason to exist beyond product distribution. They create memory, talkability, and a sense of place. They make the store worth visiting even when customers have no purchase intent — precisely the dynamic that drives discovery, conversion, and loyalty over time.

However, if Zara is a benchmark, it is a bounded one — and understanding its limits is essential for department stores defining their own strategic space.

The limits of the comparison

Zara is, and will remain, a monobrand operator. However skilfully it fragments its offer into “rooms”, collections and sub-brands (Origins, Athleticz, Beauty), the customer walks in knowing they are in a Zara store. The department store’s foundational proposition — the ability to juxtapose dozens of brands, price points and product categories under editorial curation — is structurally unavailable to Zara. This is not a marginal advantage. It is the reason a customer can walk into a department store looking for a fragrance and leave with a coat: the serendipity of adjacency, the productive collision of worlds that no monobrand environment can replicate.

Zara cannot broker trust across categories in the way a department store can. When a department store introduces a new beauty brand, endorses an emerging designer or curates a homeware edit, it lends its accumulated credibility to that selection. It acts as filter, guarantor and tastemaker. Zara can curate within its own universe, but it cannot play this intermediary role across the broader market. In an era of infinite online choice and eroding consumer trust, this curatorial authority — if actively exercised — remains a powerful differentiator.

Zara’s experiential ambitions are constrained by its economics. A café, a listening room, a curated apartment — these are meaningful gestures within a Zara flagship, but they are secondary to the core business of moving product at scale through fast-turning inventory. Zara’s gross margins (59.7%) are built on volume, speed and vertical integration. Every square metre devoted to non-selling experience is a square metre that must be justified against that model. Department stores, by contrast, have historically operated as platforms where experiences — restaurants, spas, cultural programming, personal services, events — can coexist with and reinforce commercial activity. The format is structurally better suited to deep experiential investment.

Zara cannot serve as a community anchor the way a department store can. A Zara flagship, however beautiful, is a retail destination. A department store, at its best, is a civic institution: a place where a city meets itself, where cultural programming, dining, services and commerce intertwine to create something irreplaceable in the urban fabric. This dimension — part public space, part commercial enterprise, part cultural venue — is the department store’s deepest moat, and it is one that no monobrand retailer, however ambitious, can credibly claim.

Conclusion: the experience trap

The fact that Zara’s most ambitious stores are increasingly described as “monobrand department stores” should be read as both a compliment and a warning to the sector. A compliment, because it confirms that the department store model — multi-world, experiential, locally rooted, service-rich — remains the aspirational template for physical retail at scale. Yet it is also a warning: if a vertically integrated group with €11.0 billion in net cash, €6.2 billion in annual net income, a 58.3% gross margin and €10.7 billion in online sales is converging on your format, the bar for execution is rising fast.

The logical response would be to invest even more heavily in experience as a differentiator. Yet this leads to an uncomfortable question: at what point does a department store risk becoming a destination people visit but do not buy from?

If every investment dollar flows toward restaurants, cultural programming, wellness services, co-working spaces and immersive installations — and away from the hard work of product curation, buying excellence, brand exclusivity and commercial edge — the department store may end up as a beautifully curated food hall with a diminishing fashion floor attached. The footfall metrics will look healthy. The conversion metrics will not.

This is not a theoretical risk. Some department store companies have seen experiential investments drive significant increases in traffic and dwell time, without proportional gains in product sales. The experience becomes the product — and the actual product becomes an afterthought.

The antidote is not to retreat from experience, but to insist that experience and commerce remain structurally linked. The most effective department store innovations of recent years share a common trait: they make the act of buying better, not separate from the visit. A personal styling service that ends with a curated selection ready to try. A restaurant on the fashion floor, not in a separate building. A beauty counter where the consultation is the experience and the purchase is its natural conclusion. A homeware floor designed as a series of shoppable rooms — not unlike, in fact, what Zara Home does in Lisbon.

Department stores do not need to become Zara. They cannot, and should not. But they must match Zara’s discipline in portfolio rationalisation, its rigour in technology integration, its boldness in premiumisation, and its instinct for making every store feel inevitable in its city. And they must do all of this while leveraging the one thing Zara can never replicate: the power of being a platform — for brands, for experiences, for communities, and for the irreplaceable serendipity of walking in for one thing and discovering another.

The only question is whether the sector will invest in this with the same conviction that Zara invests in its own.

Credits: IADS (Selvane Mohandas du Ménil)

What: The success of innovation is shaped by collective structure, team diversity, and leadership, rather than a universal approach to collaboration.

Why it is important: This insight challenges the one-size-fits-all approach to collaboration, emphasizing that leaders must tailor innovation strategies to their organization’s structure and goals, as supported by recent research.

Innovation thrives not through a single, universal method but by carefully aligning collective structure, diversity, and leadership to the specific needs of the challenge at hand. The article argues that while breaking down silos and maximizing connectivity can be effective in some contexts, such as tightly interdependent projects, these same strategies may hinder progress in situations requiring independent exploration or loosely coordinated efforts. Drawing on a review of 294 empirical studies, the authors identify three main types of innovation collectives—convergence-based, divergence-based, and attention-based—each demanding distinct management approaches. The value of cognitive diversity is highlighted, with research showing that teams composed of varied professional backgrounds and expertise outperform those selected solely for demographic diversity. Leadership plays a pivotal role, as transformational and rotating leadership styles foster trust, participation, and collaboration, while collective incentives and feedback mechanisms further enhance creative outcomes. Ultimately, the article underscores that effective innovation leadership lies in architecting the right collective for the problem, rather than defaulting to generic collaboration models.

IADS Notes: Recent analyses confirm that the effectiveness of innovation strategies depends on how organizations structure their collectives and manage collaboration. The nuanced perspective that breaking down silos is not always the answer is reflected in the April 2026 Harvard Business Review, which finds that the impact of silos varies with the innovation context and collective structure. This is supported by January 2026 research showing that executive teams underperform when operating in silos, highlighting the need for shared goals and cross-functional collaboration. The shift toward project-driven organizations, also noted in January 2026, demonstrates how breaking down traditional barriers and prioritizing cross-functional teams accelerates innovation. The November 2025 Wall Street Journal emphasizes that cognitive diversity drives superior innovation outcomes, a principle increasingly adopted by organizations seeking high-performing teams. Finally, BCG’s September 2025 findings reveal that empowering employees through decentralized experimentation and robust leadership systems is essential for scaling innovation, reinforcing the importance of both structure and culture in achieving sustainable progress.

When silos hinder innovation—and when they can help

What: AI is rewriting what most jobs require, making augmentation, upskilling, and new talent models central to organisational success.

Why it is important: Organisations that prioritise upskilling, balanced AI integration, and skills-based talent management are better positioned to achieve sustainable productivity and retain critical talent.

BCG's latest analysis finds that 50% to 55% of US jobs will change materially within two to three years: not disappear, but require fundamentally different skills and ways of working. Rather than wholesale job loss, most employees will see their roles augmented, requiring new skills and higher expectations for output and adaptability. Only 10% to 15% of jobs are at risk of elimination, primarily in roles with high automation potential and limited demand expandability. The distinction between substitution and augmentation is crucial: while routine, structured tasks are increasingly automated, roles demanding judgment, interpersonal skills, and complex problem-solving are more likely to be enhanced by AI. This shift makes upskilling, reskilling, and dynamic workforce planning essential, as organisations must redesign roles, invest in talent mobility, and embed workforce strategy into broader competitive planning. Companies that move beyond cost-cutting to invest in capability building and human–AI collaboration will capture productivity gains and preserve institutional knowledge as roles change.

IADS Notes: BCG (September and November 2025) highlights the urgent need for systematic upskilling and strategic workforce transformation, with only 36% of workers feeling prepared for AI-driven change. Le Monde (October 2025) and Harvard Business Review (March 2026) confirm that leading organisations are prioritising augmentation and talent development over replacement, while Journal du Net (July 2025) documents measurable productivity gains from agentic AI. HR Dive (December 2025) shows that demand for both hard and soft skills is intensifying in hiring, with inclusive leadership now a baseline expectation. BCG (March 2026) points to the strategic elevation of HR and skills-based talent management as essential for translating AI ambition into operational results, with only 11% of companies reporting a fully developed skills taxonomy.

AI will reshape more jobs than it replaces

What: Retailers are leveraging retail media networks to create new business models, improve targeting, and maintain competitiveness during economic uncertainty.

Why it is important: This development shows how retail media is evolving into a core business model, supporting retailer resilience and growth amid inflation and shifting consumer behaviour.

Retailers are increasingly turning to retail media networks as a strategic response to inflation and economic volatility, using these platforms to diversify revenue streams and strengthen profitability. By monetising both digital and physical assets through targeted advertising, retailers can offset margin pressures while offering brands enhanced opportunities for consumer engagement. The integration of first-party data and advanced analytics enables more precise targeting and measurable results, making retail media a compelling proposition for both retailers and advertisers. As the sector matures, there is a clear shift toward quality, transparency, and standardised measurement, with trust and demonstrable ROI becoming essential for sustained growth. Retailers like Delhaize exemplify this trend, leveraging loyalty data and robust KPIs to drive sales and brand lift. The evolution of retail media from a supplementary channel to a core business model is reshaping the competitive landscape, compelling retailers to innovate and adapt to changing consumer expectations and market dynamics.

IADS Notes: The growing importance of retail media is well documented in recent industry sources. Inside Retail in April 2026 emphasised its role as a buffer against inflation, while Retail Detail in June 2025 highlighted Delhaize’s success with loyalty data and measurable KPIs. MBS in July 2025 described how first-party data and advanced targeting have made retail media a margin-doubling imperative. By December 2025, Internet Retailing noted the sector’s shift toward quality and transparency, and Harvard Business Review in October 2025 stressed the need for trust and standardised measurement to ensure long-term credibility and growth.

Why retail media is your secret weapon against inflation

What: The retail industry is undergoing a major realignment as consumer power, trust, technology, and new business models reshape strategies and leadership.

Why it is important: These changes highlight the urgency for retailers to adapt quickly to evolving consumer expectations and operational challenges.

The retail sector is experiencing a significant transformation driven by a decisive shift in consumer power, with shoppers demanding more value, transparency, and digital sophistication from brands. Retailers are responding by rethinking their strategies, investing in private-label products, and enhancing operational agility to remain relevant in an increasingly segmented market. The rise of AI-driven shopping tools and interactive technologies is compelling companies to innovate, offering more personalised and engaging experiences both online and in-store. Trust and transparency have become essential, particularly as younger consumers, such as Gen Z, expect brands to provide verifiable proof of ethical practices and social responsibility. This environment is prompting retailers to adopt omnichannel approaches and explore new business models that prioritise customer loyalty and operational resilience. At the same time, leadership and organisational culture are evolving, with a growing emphasis on agility, collaboration, and project-driven structures to foster innovation and sustain growth. The industry’s ability to adapt to these sweeping changes will determine its future success.

IADS Notes: The Great Realignment described in The Robin Report is reinforced by recent industry developments. In March 2026, BoF reported Macy’s CEO highlighting how consumer segmentation and value-driven behaviours are reshaping retail strategies. Forbes in February 2026 detailed the rise of agentic commerce and the influence of AI-driven shopping tools on retailer adaptation. Harvard Business Review in October 2025 emphasised the critical role of trust and transparency in retail media networks and brand relationships, particularly for Gen Z. Journal du Net in July 2025 showcased the adoption of interactive technologies in physical retail environments, while Harvard Business Review in January 2026 underlined the importance of agile leadership and project-driven organisational cultures for fostering innovation and resilience in the sector.

12 emerging rules and predictions for retail