PRINTABLE VERSION HERE

The integration of sustainable practices is no longer an option for retailers across the planet, due to impending national and international regulations, combined with consumers’ growing preference to buy sustainable products and engage with responsible brands. However, if the intention is the same, the execution might significantly differ from one continent to another.It starts with the way national companies handle global guidelines. For instance, the 17 UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) provide a framework for sustainability priorities, but retailers in each country prioritise different SDGs according to their national strategies and culture. For example, Chinese enterprises have focused on “Good Health and Well-being” (SDG 3), “Quality Education” (SDG 4), “Responsible Consumption and Production” (SDG 12), and “Decent Work and Economic Growth” (SDG 8)i . In the meantime, in the US, the private sector has an increased focus on “Clean Energy” (SDG 7) and “Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure” (SDG 9)ii . This difference in sustainability priorities must be reflected in the undertakings of the retail sector attempting to engage and expand in new markets.

Even within regional blocs, differences arise. One of the key takeaways of Bain & Company’s report on sustainability for Asia-Pacific consumers is that fast-growth markets such as India, China, Indonesia and Vietnam care more about sustainability than mature markets like Japan, South Korea and Singapore. A possible explanation cited is that witnessing first-hand the impact of environmental issues in emerging markets makes these threats real and tangible. The average pollution in fast-growing markets is two and a half times that of mature markets, with the highest levels being in India and China.Today, we are seeing an increasing number of retailers and department stores commence or enhance their operations in growing markets such as India and China. India saw the entrance of 27 international retail brands in 2024, including Saks Fifth Avenue, which announced its interest for the market a few years after Galeries Lafayette announced they would open a store in 2026. In China, despite a luxury slowdown, retailers such as Metro AG and the retail conglomerate SM Investments have expanded their Chinese footprint in Tier 1 and Tier 2 cities. Across both countries, the majority of the population is concerned about the environment. But do consumers in these emerging markets have the same definition of sustainability as the West? And to what extent does the notion of sustainability differ from a consumer and retailer’s perspective, in each country, compared to the West?

Consumer sentiment on sustainability in the West: The responsibility lies on brands

According to the European Commission’s Eurobarometer, 78% of Europeans agreed that environmental issues directly affect their daily life and health and over 80% agreed that EU legislation is needed to protect the environment in their countries.

This reflects the fact that, in the West, the onus of creating and maintaining sustainable practices is divided more evenly between the government and the private sector. For 92% of Europeans, companies should pay for the costs of cleaning up their pollution, while 74% agree that public authorities should pay for the costsiii.

Almost 60% of European respondents demonstrated a willingness to pay more for sustainable products that are easier to repair, recyclable and/or produced in an environmentally sustainable way. However, these results differ over research reports with BCG’s 2024 European Consumer Sentiment Report finding that while Europeans consider sustainability while they shop, only 20% declare that they would pay more for green products. Repair has become one of the newer features of sustainability in the West where 77% of European citizens would rather fix a product than substitute it, as of a 2022 survey by the EU. This sentiment has been capitalised on by retailers such as Decathlon, providing bike repair services in-store and online support for customers to self-repair products, as well as Uniqlo’s Repair Studio for repairing and upcycling products.

In the US, 78% of consumers say a sustainable lifestyle is important. Products making ESG-related claims averaged 28% cumulative growth over the past five-year period, versus 20% for products that made no such claimsiv . According to EY’s US Future Consumer Index, sustainable products command a 39% price premium compared with conventional products. Research by OnePoll also showed that 55% of Americans would cease using a brand upon discovering its lack of commitment to environmental sustainability. 42% of respondents said they can tell when a company is trying to greenwash their activities.

Overall, in the US and Europe, sustainability is an important issue to consumers. However, they place the responsibility for sustainable production and consumption more on the private sector than on the government. This may be a feature of already having advanced regulatory standards, especially in the EU. Despite this, consumers in Western countries are only willing to pay between 8 and 10% extra for sustainable products which is lesser than consumers in India and China. The sustainability say-do gap, which reflects the difference between expressed intention and action, looms large in Western countries.

Consumer sentiment in India: Sustainability as an efficiency operation

In India, as in many other developing countries, sustainable actions take the form of operational efficiency. An ingrained reflex for most Indians, reusing, recycling, and repair are foremost cost and effort savers, which now also translate into conscious consumption of sustainable goods. As a saving economy, Indians are prone to avoiding the wastage of goods and services, including money and food. Indian consumers are also cautious regarding greenwashing and paying premiums for sustainable products.

Several sources make it clear that sustainability is an important issue for Indians. 92% of Indians are concerned for the environment, while 66% feel it is at riskv . Two in three urban Indian consumers prioritised environmentally responsible actions taken by businessesvi . Indians also have a dual focus on wellness and sustainability, with 33% stating that they opt for natural products for health benefitsvii . Finally, according to PwC India’s Voice of the Consumer Survey, 46% of Indian consumers view climate change as a significant threat, driving 60% of them to change their behaviour and move toward sustainable products. They are even willing to pay a premium of 13.1% (vs price base lines) for sustainably sourced goods.

However, only 30% of Indians perceive sustainability as the responsibility of private companies with the majority believing it is the government’s responsibility to address sustainability issuesviii .  Despite re-use and repair as engrained practices, there is a sustainability say-do gap in India, which is explained by high prices and limited product information and availability. As a collectivist society with a recently booming economy, Indians tend to place their expectations for responsible actions on the community and institutions. Brands and corporations taking the lead on sustainability can hence build brand value and equity by engaging with the community. Though facing the right direction, the average Indian can be better nudged to invest in sustainable initiatives. A growing number of consumers, especially younger generations, are more conscious about their consumption and which brands they engage with.

The repair culture in India is very developed resulting from a combination of high price sensitivity and low labour cost to repair products. Technicians are available for a low cost to repair almost every product ranging from apparel and shoes to washing machines and microwaves. For example, Decathlon’s bike repair initiative will not make as many gains in India as it does in France due to the existence of cheap and convenient bike repair shops. While Decathlon does run this initiative in India, it has been outsourced to a third-party provider that runs digital workshops with little advertising. Given that most retailers such as Decathlon exclusively repair purchases made in their store or of their brand (i.e. Decathlon repairs only Decathlon brand bikes or other bikes bought at a Decathlon store), it prompts questions on the relevance and perception of such initiatives for Indian consumers with access to cheaper, more convenient, and non-exclusive alternatives.

On the other hand, enhancing value as part of a repair or recycling scheme can resonate with customers who prioritise value. For example, Yves Saint Laurent’s repair services for perfume bottles and refills that can be attached to existing containers can be framed as a value-added service that is also sustainable especially for luxury products. Retailers aiming to enter emerging markets will do well to understand the nuance of repair, where an approach like that in the West could lead to public backlash and accusations of greenwashing.

Consumer sentiment on sustainability in China: Not at the cost of convenience

The government drives the sustainable transition in China; consumers and the private sector are involved but not to comparable levels in the West. Most consumers prefer convenience over sustainability and are still in “consumption catch-up mode”. Large Chinese conglomerates are increasingly publishing ESG reports and pushing sustainability initiatives to keep pace with their Western counterparts.

A feature of sustainability in China is that it revolves mainly around environmental concerns and does not include social issues and human rights concerns as much as in the West. PwC’s June 2022 are willing to switch to brands that emphasise sustainability and corporate responsibility. As an emerging economy focused on savings, China also has a strong availability of low-cost labour for repair. This has also been characterised by a developed used goods market where all kinds of used products are refurbished and prepared to be resold. For example,

Centergate Como in Zhongguancun, Beijing’s IT neighbourhood, is a gigantic six floor shopping mall filled with small electronics shops selling all kinds of used gadgets.

UNDP’s Survey Report on Business and Sustainability in China found that while 89% of Chinese companies surveyed know the SDGs, 42% do not yet know how to measure their contributions towards them. Chinese enterprises have also prioritised SDGs concentrating on health and well-being, education, responsible production and consumption and decent work and economic growth. Enterprises are undertaking sustainable development projects based on their branding and image-building needs. Chinese enterprises have also prioritised SDGs concentrating on health and well-being, education, responsible production and consumption and decent work and economic growth. Enterprises are undertaking sustainable development projects based on their needs of branding and image-building.

According to Ipsos, air pollution was the leading environmental concern for Chinese consumers with 45%. Many families visit play areas in shopping malls because it is deemed safer than playing outdoors. The Credit Suisse Research Institute also reported that more than 50% of Chinese consumers were distrustful of corporate sustainability claims: greenwashing is obvious to most consumers. As a result, luxury groups are more likely to foster higher engagement if there is a greater focus on local green issues. For example, Prada hosted a Re-Nylon pop-up store to engage shoppers at SKP-S in Beijing in late 2020.

While data on the sustainability say-do gap in China is minimal, research shows that consumers are willing to pay greater premiums for sustainable products in emerging markets with high levels of environmental concern. More so than in India, the burden of tackling sustainability is on the Chinese government with private enterprises keeping themselves competitive by increasing ESG monitoring and publishing reports. For consumers, air pollution and other environmental issues top the list of concerns with a significant focus on health but not at the cost of convenience.

L'Oréal: A case analysis of contextualised sustainability by brands

L'Oréal Groupe is one of the global frontrunners in sustainability engagements helmed by the private sector. It has been recognised as a United Nations Global Compact LEAD company for over seven years. As part of its commitment to the Ten Principles for responsible business and for placing the United Nation’s SDGs, L'Oréal launched its second sustainability programme, L’Oréal for the Future, in June 2020.  With a variety of environmental and social commitments, the analysis for this article focuses on three aspects:

• Comparative analysis on the kind of environmental initiatives L’Oréal undertakes in India, China and the US.
• Local adaptations of their global ‘Stand Up’ initiative that aims at combatting street harassment. L’Oréal has also operated in both India and China for nearly three decades through wholly owned subsidiaries.
• The leveraging of local sustainability issues to build value. .

On environmental initiatives, the overarching 2030 objective is to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions of all scopes by 50% per finished product. As a member of the ‘Business Ambition for 1.5°C’ initiative, the Group has also committed to net zero emissions by 2050.

The Chinese teams continue advancing the L’Oréal for the Future programme, from eco-design to plastics recycling. One example is L’Oréal Paris Extraordinary Oil shampoo, an innovation developed by teams in China whereby every part of the packaging, including the pump, is recyclable – a first for the Group.

In India, L’Oréal’s operated sites including factories, distribution centres, research and innovation centres and administrative offices have achieved 100% renewable energy usage. Furthermore, their Green Pathways project focuses on ecological restoration in the drought-prone and water-scarce Yavatmal district in Maharashtra, India. Since its inception in 2021, over 4,500 hectares of degraded land has been restored, enhancing water storage capacity in the region by 150 million litres, benefiting over 1,800 vulnerable farmer families with a 20% increase in income. By 2030, they aim to restore 10,000 hectares of land through this initiative.

L’Oréal USA joined the US Plastics pact, which brings together over 850 organisations over common definitions and concrete targets to accelerate progress toward the US circular economy for plastic. L’Oréal’s commitment to land restoration in India corresponds to Indian consumers’ focus on environmental pollution while in the US, collaborative action for a circular economy is prioritised where the discussion around sustainability revolves around the circular economy.

L’Oréal’s ‘Stand Up’ initiative aims to promote self-defence training to combat street harassment. However, in China, the brand delved deeper into understanding its consumer profile and the social concerns of its target audience. This led to a shift in focus towards addressing sexual harassment in the workplace, making it more relevant to the local context. In India, this programme has trained over 850,000 individuals to effectively address street harassment. While their global initiative is partnered with Right to Be, in India L’Oréal has partnered with Breakthrough, an Indian NGO working against gender-based violence and discrimination. In France, on the other hand, the ‘Stand Up’ programme has online courses and statistics on street harassment with a call to include victims and witnesses of this crime. This manner of responding to their consumers in each country – workplace harassment in China, partnering with local NGOs on gender-based violence in India and directly addressing women in France through their website, reflects a localised approach for their global programmes to enhance the impact of these initiatives.

Not only cascading group level initiatives, L’Oréal’s country subsidiaries also create and run their own sustainability initiatives to leverage locally relevant topics. For example, diversity and inclusion is a priority for L’Oréal USA with the Inclusive Beauty Fund and civil society partnerships with onePULSE Foundation for its scholarship programme. This reflects the ongoing cultural conversation in the US where diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) is forefront for consumers. L’Oréal USA’s website has statistics on gender, sexuality, disability, Black Indigenous People of Colour, veteran and working parents’ representation in the organisation. While this caters to the US’ approach of affirmative action and upliftment, this kind of representation is unachievable and to some degree, unnecessary, in markets like France where the perspective is based on equal rather than equitable treatment of minorities.

L’Oréal Groupe’s brands showcase a high degree of autonomy when it comes to their approach to sustainability topics. For example, in 2014, Garnier faced backlash as their personal care products were distributed in care packages to female Israeli soldiers by its Israeli subsidiary. Garnier USA then released a statement saying that they do not condone this initiative managed strictly at a local level. This contrarian navigation by both Garnier Israel and Garnier USA shows how brands manage local adaptations including dealing with controversial topics.

L’Oréal’s brands and strategies provide a clear perspective on the mix of group-level initiatives, that align with larger goals and strategies, and country-level initiatives, that correspond to local consumer sentiment and values. The right balance of autonomy and leadership in sustainability related areas is key to build brand value for retailers.

Conclusion: The collectivist vs. individualist approach to sustainability

Consumers have distinct regional variations in sustainability implementation and consumer attitudes that have an impact on the retail sector. In Western markets, environmental responsibility is shared between government and private sectors, with a strong focus on social and environmental issues both. In contrast, emerging markets like India and China approach sustainability through the lens of operational efficiency and cost savings. Despite showing higher environmental concerns than mature markets, Indian consumers expect governmental leadership in sustainability initiatives while remaining cautious about greenwashing. China presents a unique case where sustainability is predominantly government-driven, focusing primarily on environmental rather than social concerns, with consumers showing increasing scepticism towards corporate sustainability claims.This is due to the cheap availability of labour combined with cultures where saving is prioritised. According to Bain & Company, consumers in fast-growing markets, where environmental concerns tend to be highest - such as India, Indonesia, Brazil, and China - are willing to pay between 15 and 20%, a greater premium than in the West. Additionally, consumers cited the lack of availability of a variety of sustainable products as a challenge. Overall, the Indian consumer is highly price-sensitive and hence focuses on sustainability efficiently. Extremely averse to greenwashing, this group focuses on sustainable products for health and wellness benefits to counter the impact of environmental pollution. An analysis of the repair economy in these three zones shows that while Western countries approach it as a sustainable method with retailers starting to incorporate it into their offerings, emerging markets such as India and China have advanced economies for repair due to operational efficiencies.The sustainability say-do gap reflects the difference between expressed intention and action. While data from the US and Europe shows that consumers will not pay significant premiums for sustainable products, there is a lack of information regarding emerging markets like India and China. Ipsos Behavioural Science White Paper on the sustainability say-do gap details that focusing on enabling actions that people are already inclined to take can facilitate the adoption of sustainable behaviours. This provides a concrete action plan for retailers and brands where they can build brand value by engaging with consumers on sustainable actions that they are leaning towards taking. For example, consumers in the Asia-Pacific region tend far more towards health-conscious decision-making compared to their Western counterparts. They consider making healthier choices for themselves and their families, often evaluating sustainable products to improve health. By adapting their sustainable initiatives and communication around this focus on health and wellness, retailers can build a connection with their customers.L'Oréal's case study demonstrates the value of having a strategic global vision with local execution for sustainability topics. From land restoration initiatives in India, gender equality programmes in China, and diversity and inclusion programmes in the US, L’Oreal has provided guiding principles for retailers on successful market-specific adaptation of sustainability initiatives. It has provided a clear framework on how group-level initiatives like Stand Up can be implemented at a local level to ensure impact and brand relevance. Striking the strategic balance between global vision and local execution has proven increasingly crucial for brands and retailers alike.