What to think of Amazon’s opening of a new, large, store format?
What: Amazon’s repeated store closures and new Chicago flagship highlight its ongoing struggle to find a successful formula for physical retail, despite deep pockets and technological innovation.
Why it is important: Amazon’s repeated failures in physical retail highlight the critical importance of experienced merchant leadership, operational discipline, and local expertise—factors that technology and capital alone cannot replace.
Amazon’s latest move to shutter all Go and Fresh stores, while planning a massive new hybrid grocery and fulfillment center in Chicago, underscores the company’s ongoing challenges in physical retail. Despite its dominance in ecommerce and technological prowess, Amazon has struggled to translate its digital strengths into brick-and-mortar success, with frequent pivots, brand fragmentation, and a history of failed store concepts. The company’s lack of experienced retail leadership and operational discipline has led to costly missteps, including at least 100 store closures and a $720 million impairment charge in 2022 alone. While the new Chicago flagship aims to compete directly with Walmart by blending grocery, general merchandise, and fulfillment, the scale and complexity of physical retail remain daunting. The contrasting trajectories of Amazon and Walmart illustrate that deep pockets and innovation are not enough; sustainable growth in physical retail requires brand clarity, customer trust, and a deep understanding of local markets. As Amazon continues to experiment, its experience serves as a cautionary tale for tech-driven retailers seeking to expand into established retail sectors.
IADS Notes: Amazon’s ongoing struggle to establish a successful physical retail presence is well documented in recent IADS sources. As highlighted by Journal du Net (January 2026), Amazon’s decision to exit most physical retail formats—including the closure of its Fresh stores—marks a clear pivot toward a delivery-centric model and signals the end of its brick-and-mortar ambitions in the US. Retail Week (September 2025) and Inside Retail (October 2025) further underscore the challenges Amazon has faced in scaling frictionless retail and adapting digital-native strategies to established sectors, with the closure of Fresh grocery stores in the UK and the failure of Just Walk Out technology revealing the operational and consumer trust barriers to success. The Wall Street Journal (January 2026) and PYMNTS (February 2025) confirm that Amazon’s latest move—a 230,000-square-foot hybrid store in Chicago—represents another high-stakes attempt to blend grocery, general merchandise, and fulfillment, but raises questions about scalability and long-term viability compared to Walmart’s 4,600-store network. Meanwhile, Walmart’s transformation into a tech-driven, omnichannel leader is thoroughly documented by Financial Times (February and November 2025), WWD (September 2025), and The Economist (May 2025), with investments in AI, automation, and store innovation enabling it to maintain market dominance and attract higher-income shoppers. The contrasting trajectories of Amazon and Walmart illustrate the complexity of omnichannel strategy, with each excelling in one domain but struggling to match the other’s strengths. Collectively, these sources show that deep pockets and technological prowess are not enough to guarantee success in physical retail, where operational discipline, brand clarity, and local expertise remain critical for sustainable growth and competitive advantage.
What to think of Amazon’s opening of a new, large, store format?
