Lender Pathlight sues Saks after clearing the way for the Neiman’s deal

News
 |  
May 2025
 |  
WWD
Save to favorites
Your item is now saved. It can take a few minutes to sync into your saved list.

What: Pathlight Capital sues Saks Global for USD 8.8 million in unpaid fees related to restructuring the company's debt ahead of the Neiman Marcus acquisition, while Saks claims the lender's actions led to Hudson's Bay's liquidation.

Why it is important: The lawsuit highlights the complex financial challenges facing luxury retail consolidation, as Saks Global struggles to manage debt obligations while implementing a USD 500 million cost-reduction strategy amid declining bond values. The legal dispute between Pathlight Capital and Saks Global centres on USD 8.8 million in unpaid fees stemming from debt restructuring that facilitated the USD 2.7 billion Neiman Marcus acquisition. While Pathlight claims it fulfilled its obligations and is owed two installments of USD 4.4 million each, Saks alleges the lender's lack of good faith cooperation prevented Hudson's Bay from securing crucial refinancing, ultimately forcing its liquidation. The conflict emerges at a challenging time for Saks Global, with its bonds trading at 38 cents on the dollar and a USD 120 million interest payment due in June. The company faces additional pressures from vendor relationships, with new payment terms and past-due bills requiring attention. The lawsuit adds another layer of complexity to Saks' broader transformation efforts, which include significant cost reductions and operational changes across the merged entity. The timing is particularly delicate as the company works to reset the U.S. luxury retail landscape while managing various stakeholder interests.

IADS Notes: The Pathlight lawsuit over USD 8.8 million in unpaid fees emerges at a critical juncture in Saks Global's post-merger journey. Since completing the USD 2.7 billion Neiman Marcus acquisition in December 2024, the company has faced mounting challenges in managing its transformation. In February 2025, the implementation of 90-day vendor payment terms and a 25% reduction in brand partnerships sparked significant industry backlash, suggesting broader financial pressures. These tensions escalated in April 2025 with the elimination of 550 positions as part of a USD 500 million cost-reduction strategy. The current situation, with bonds trading at 58 cents on the dollar and a looming USD 120 million interest payment due in June 2025, while maintaining USD 350-400 million in liquidity, reflects the complex challenges of balancing financial obligations with operational transformation in luxury retail consolidation.


Lender Pathlight sues Saks after clearing the way for the Neiman’s deal